VAT

Special audit of UP VAT refunds issued in FY 2016-17 and 2017-18 till July 2017 ordered

Special audit of UP VAT refunds issued in FY 2016-17 and 2017-18 till July 2017 ordered where single refund amount was Rs 10 lakhs or more.

Special audit of UP VAT refunds 

Commissioner , Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax has issued order for special audit of refunds issued during FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18 (till July 2017) wherever the amount of a single refund was Rs. Ten lakhs or more.

The office order dated 21st August, 2017 which has been issued in this respect states that it had been repeatedly instructed that before grant of the refund, its verification by the concerned official is mandatory.

The letter also states that from the preliminary investigation of files related to large amount of refunds in connection with the refund of Rs. 22.11 crores granted in Kanpur, it has come to light that few such refunds have been granted in which firms related to purchases were non-existent. Information of verification was sent to wrong zone officer. In the documents presented by the Exporters, there is difference in the places of exports. Showing purchase at higher rate, the goods has been sold at a lesser price. Documents sent for verification did not include details of all invoices related to purchases. This situation is very serious and represents poor monitoring of the supervising officials.

The letter instructs that the said special audit must be completed by 20th September, 2017 and recommendation for action to be taken against the defaulting officials should be sent by 15/10/2017.

 

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

22 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

23 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Canara Bank Online Concurrent Auditors Empanelment 2026-27. Last Date 09.05.2026

Canara Bank Online Concurrent Auditors Empanelment 2026-27. Last Date to apply online is 09.05.2026 Canara Bank Online Concurrent Auditors Empanelment…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CIT(E) should have provided opportunity to assessee to produce documents – ITAT

The CIT(E) should have provided opportunity to assessee to produce documents and should have decided the application on its merit…

1 day ago