Supreme Court

  • Supreme Court

Empanelment of Amicus Curiae-Supreme Court invites consents

Empanelment of Amicus Curiae at Supreme Court The amicus curiae figure originated in Roman law.  An amicus curiae (meaning "friend of the court") is someone who…

6 years ago
  • Excise

Cenvat Credit on GTA service for transport of goods to buyer’s premises not admissible-Supreme Court

Cenvat Credit on goods transport agency service availed for transport of goods from place of removal to buyer’s premises not…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Rule 8D is prospective in operation and not apply prior to AY 2008­-09 – Supreme Court

Income Tax Rule 8D is prospective in operation and could not apply to any assessment year prior to AY 2008­-09 - Supreme Court settles the law…

6 years ago
  • Aadhaar

Deadline for linking Aadhaar with bank and mobile extended to 31-03-2017 by Supreme Court

Deadline for linking Aadhaar with bank and mobile extended to 31-03-2017. Supreme Court directs extension for both Union Government and…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 80IB ineligible if undertaking do not remain SSI in a particular assessment year-SC

Exemption u/s 80IB ineligible if undertaking do not remain SSI in a particular assessment year even if in initial year…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT Instruction of tax effect applies to pending appeals also – Supreme Court

CBDT Instruction of tax effect applies to pending appeals also subject to the two caveats provided in Surya Herbal Ltd.…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT cannot issue circular with retrospective effect-Supreme Court

CBDT cannot issue circular with retrospective effect-Supreme Court. Revised monetary limits for appeals to apply prospectively. CBDT vide Instruction No.…

6 years ago
  • Income Tax

Supreme Court explains scope and interpretation of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act 1961

Supreme Court explains scope and interpretation of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act 1961. Provisions of Sections 5 and…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Mere outsourcing business to Indian subsidiary do not constitute Permanent Establishment -SC

Mere outsourcing business to Indian subsidiary do not constitute Permanent Establishment within the meaning of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement - Supreme…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) do not extend to non-shareholders-Supreme Court agrees with High Court

Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) do not extend to non-shareholders. The fiction not to be extended further for broadening the concept…

7 years ago