Companies Act

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT for four years. Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT to act as Chairperson NCLAT

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4607(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 96(E) dated 05th January, 2021, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as four years or till the attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier in terms of Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. Further, in pursuance of Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16.09.2021 in WP (C) 1027/2021, the period from 11.09.2021 to 20.09.2021 will be included as part of continuous service of Justice (Retired) Shri. A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member as the officiating Chairperson with all service benefits as a special case, and he is allowed to work as the officiating Chairperson upto 20.09.2021 to enable him to pronounce the judgements prepared by him, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances. This shall not be treated as a precedent.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.

Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4608(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 10.09.2021, Justice (Retd.) Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT, will act as Chairperson, NCLAT for a period of three months with effect from 11.09.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

1 day ago
  • ICAI

ICAI issues FAQs on key accounting implications arising from New Labour Codes

FAQs on key accounting implications arising from the New Labour Codes Recently, Government consolidated existing labour laws into four new…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80-IA(7) not allowed for delayed filing of audit report in Form 10CCB

Filing audit report in Form 10CCB within due date is mandatory. The assessee cannot claim deduction u/s 80-IA(7) he ground…

2 days ago