Companies Act

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT for four years. Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT to act as Chairperson NCLAT

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4607(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 96(E) dated 05th January, 2021, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as four years or till the attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier in terms of Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. Further, in pursuance of Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16.09.2021 in WP (C) 1027/2021, the period from 11.09.2021 to 20.09.2021 will be included as part of continuous service of Justice (Retired) Shri. A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member as the officiating Chairperson with all service benefits as a special case, and he is allowed to work as the officiating Chairperson upto 20.09.2021 to enable him to pronounce the judgements prepared by him, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances. This shall not be treated as a precedent.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.

Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4608(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 10.09.2021, Justice (Retd.) Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT, will act as Chairperson, NCLAT for a period of three months with effect from 11.09.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

3 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

12 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago