Companies Act

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT for four years. Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT to act as Chairperson NCLAT

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4607(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 96(E) dated 05th January, 2021, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as four years or till the attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier in terms of Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. Further, in pursuance of Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16.09.2021 in WP (C) 1027/2021, the period from 11.09.2021 to 20.09.2021 will be included as part of continuous service of Justice (Retired) Shri. A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member as the officiating Chairperson with all service benefits as a special case, and he is allowed to work as the officiating Chairperson upto 20.09.2021 to enable him to pronounce the judgements prepared by him, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances. This shall not be treated as a precedent.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.

Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4608(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 10.09.2021, Justice (Retd.) Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT, will act as Chairperson, NCLAT for a period of three months with effect from 11.09.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • arbitration

Whether Arbitral Tribunal can grant a prohibited claim in a contract – Larger Bench to decide

Whether a prohibited claim in a contract applies only to the employer and not to the Arbitral Tribunal – Matter…

1 hour ago
  • contract-law

Court can examine contractual employee termination on sole ground of ineligibility

Where a contractual employee is terminated on the sole ground of ineligibility, the Court is entitled to examine its correctness…

2 hours ago
  • EPFO

Upon deceased acquiring family, as specified earlier GPF nomination became invalid – SC

Upon deceased acquiring family, GPF nomination in favour of mother became invalid and in absence of fresh nomination, mother and…

3 hours ago
  • GST

Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details

GSTN Advisory on Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details as per Rule 10A As…

4 hours ago
  • GST

ITC can’t be denied on ground that supplier’s registration was cancelled subsequently

ITC can’t be denied on ground that supplier’s registration was cancelled subsequently when supplier had filed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Amount of Rs. 6 lakh claimed as gift received from parents in law not unreasonably high – ITAT

Amount of Rs. 6 lakh claimed to have been received as gift from parents in law not an excessively or…

1 day ago