Companies Act

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT

Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT for four years. Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT to act as Chairperson NCLAT

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4607(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 96(E) dated 05th January, 2021, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as four years or till the attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier in terms of Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. Further, in pursuance of Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16.09.2021 in WP (C) 1027/2021, the period from 11.09.2021 to 20.09.2021 will be included as part of continuous service of Justice (Retired) Shri. A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member as the officiating Chairperson with all service benefits as a special case, and he is allowed to work as the officiating Chairperson upto 20.09.2021 to enable him to pronounce the judgements prepared by him, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances. This shall not be treated as a precedent.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.

Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021

S.O. 4608(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 10.09.2021, Justice (Retd.) Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT, will act as Chairperson, NCLAT for a period of three months with effect from 11.09.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.

[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]

GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago