Govt. revise tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member NCLAT for four years. Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT to act as Chairperson NCLAT
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021
S.O. 4607(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 3855(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 96(E) dated 05th January, 2021, the Central Government hereby revise the tenure of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema as Judicial Member, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as four years or till the attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier in terms of Section 5 of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. Further, in pursuance of Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16.09.2021 in WP (C) 1027/2021, the period from 11.09.2021 to 20.09.2021 will be included as part of continuous service of Justice (Retired) Shri. A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member as the officiating Chairperson with all service benefits as a special case, and he is allowed to work as the officiating Chairperson upto 20.09.2021 to enable him to pronounce the judgements prepared by him, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances. This shall not be treated as a precedent.
[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy.
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3864(E), dated the 11th December, 2017
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 2nd November, 2021
S.O. 4608(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 10.09.2021, Justice (Retd.) Shri Venugopal M, Judicial Member, NCLAT, will act as Chairperson, NCLAT for a period of three months with effect from 11.09.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[F. No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Secy
In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…