Companies Act

Individuals with duplicate-multiple DINs can retain only Oldest DIN, Later ones have to be surrendered

Individuals with duplicate-multiple DINs can retain only Oldest DIN. Later DINs have to be surrendered.

MCA has issued an advisory in respect of DIN Surrender.

It has been stated that an individual who is in possession of Duplicate/Multiple Director Identification Numbers (DINs), can retain the Oldest DIN only. DINs obtained later have to be surrendered.

Further it has been stated that DIN once associated is NOT eligible for surrender.

MCA is conducting KYC of all Directors of all companies through a new eform viz. DIR-3 KYC for every Director who has been allotted DIN on or before 31st March, 2018 and whose DIN is in ‘Approved’ status. Such directors are mandatorily required to file form DIR-3 KYC on or before 15th Sep, 2018

In 2014, MCA acknowledged that in MCA database, there were  7135 individuals holding multiple Director Identification Numbers (DINs) dating back to the period prior to June, 2011 when validation of application for DIN with the Income Tax PAN data was made compulsory.

Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits obtaining or possessing duplicate Director Identification Numbers. Section 159 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes punishment for holding duplicate DIN.

The cancellation or surrender procedure has been prescribed in Rule 11 of  the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

10 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

19 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago