Companies Act

List of Nidhi companies whose NDH- 4 declaration form rejected by Ministry

List of incorporated Nidhi companies wherein NDH- 4 form for declaration as Nidhi Company have been rejected by Ministry.

Amended section 406 of the Companies Act and Nidhi rules (as amended from time to time) requires that companies have to apply to the Central Government in Form NDH-4 for updation of their status/declaration as Nidhi company. some Companies have applied to the Central Government for updation/declaration as Nidhi Company under the amended provisions of Act/Rules.

While

examining those applications, the Central Government has noticed that those Companies are not complying with the applicable provisions of the Act and rules made thereunder in toto. Also, a large no. of companies are functioning as Nidhi company and as Per amended companies Act, 2013 are required to file application in form NDH-4 before Central Government to declare them as “Nidhi Company”. However, all the companies functioning as Nidhi company haven’t submitted their application within the fixed time frame prescribed under Nidhi Rules and therefore have committed violation of those rules. Therefore, the investors are advised to verify the antecedents/status of such Company, before becoming its member and take an informed decision before investing in such companies.

Till date, 404 applications filed by such Companies have been rejected by Central Government. Download list of rejected companies Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago