Companies Act

Partnership firms/companies not eligible to be a registered valuer if not member of RVO

Partnership entity or company not eligible to be a registered valuer if  not a member of a registered valuers organisation (RVO). MCA has notified the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2022.

The MCA vide notification no. G.S.R. 831(E) dated 21.11.2022 has amended the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017.

As per the amendment No partnership entity or company shall be eligible to be a registered valuer if  it is not a member of a registered valuers organisation (RVO).

It has been provided that it shall not be a member of more than one such registered valuers organisation at a given point of time. Also, the partnership entity or company, already registered as valuers, on the date of commencement of the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2022, shall comply within six months of such commencement with the conditions.

Also, it has been mandated that A registered valuer shall intimate the authority for change in the personal details, or any modification in the composition of partners or directors, or any modification in any clause of the partnership agreementor Memorandum of Association, which may affect registration of registered valuer, after paying fee.

Similarly, a new Rule 14A has been inserted to provide that a registered valuers organisation shall intimate the authority for change in composition of its governing board, or its committees or appellate panel, or other details, after payment of prescribed fee.

It has been clarified that a member functioning as a whole time director in the company registered as valuer shall not be treated as taking up employment for the purpose of this provision.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago