Companies Act

Partnership firms/companies not eligible to be a registered valuer if not member of RVO

Partnership entity or company not eligible to be a registered valuer if  not a member of a registered valuers organisation (RVO). MCA has notified the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2022.

The MCA vide notification no. G.S.R. 831(E) dated 21.11.2022 has amended the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017.

As per the amendment No partnership entity or company shall be eligible to be a registered valuer if  it is not a member of a registered valuers organisation (RVO).

It has been provided that it shall not be a member of more than one such registered valuers organisation at a given point of time. Also, the partnership entity or company, already registered as valuers, on the date of commencement of the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Amendment Rules, 2022, shall comply within six months of such commencement with the conditions.

Also, it has been mandated that A registered valuer shall intimate the authority for change in the personal details, or any modification in the composition of partners or directors, or any modification in any clause of the partnership agreementor Memorandum of Association, which may affect registration of registered valuer, after paying fee.

Similarly, a new Rule 14A has been inserted to provide that a registered valuers organisation shall intimate the authority for change in composition of its governing board, or its committees or appellate panel, or other details, after payment of prescribed fee.

It has been clarified that a member functioning as a whole time director in the company registered as valuer shall not be treated as taking up employment for the purpose of this provision.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Reassessment on basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau quashed

ITAT quashed reassessment on the basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau without applying mind In a recent judgment, ITAT…

13 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) genuineness of expenditure not relevant issue

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) for payments to specified persons, genuineness of expenditure is not a relevant issue. In a…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not a vital defect – ITAT

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not such a vital defect on the basis of which, re-opening…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation not an order for Revision u/s 264 of Income Tax Act

Section 143(1) Intimation is only an intimation and it cannot be treated as an order for the purpose of Section…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT with jurisdiction over non corporate assesee can’t transfer corporate assessee’s case

Order u/s 127 quashed as PCIT having jurisdiction over non corporate assesee could not have transferred case of a corporate…

7 hours ago
  • DGFT

Modalities for issue of export authorizations of wheat flour & related products

DGFT issues modalities for eligibility, receipt and processing of applications for issuance of authorizations for export of wheat flour and…

11 hours ago