Companies Act

Satisfaction of charge to be filed with ROC within 300 days in Form No.CHG-4 MCA Notification

Satisfaction of charge to be filed with ROC within 300 days in Form No.CHG-4 along with the fee. MCA enhances the period to 300 days from 30 days

Government of India
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Notification

New Delhi, 5th July, 2018

G. S. R. ……….. (E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Registration of Charges) Amendment Rules, 2018.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014,

(i) in rule 3, in sub-rule (1), for the words “and filed”, the words “shall be filed” shall be substituted;

(ii) for sub-rule (1) of rule 8, the following shall be substituted namely;-

“8. “(1) A company or charge holder shall within a period of three hundred days from the date of the payment or satisfaction in full of any charge registered under Chapter VI, give intimation of the same to the Registrar in Form No.CHG-4 along with the fee.” ;

(iii) in rule 12, in sub-rule (1), for the words “within thirty days” the words “within a period of three hundred days” shall be substituted.

[F.No. 01/10/2013 CL-V ]

K.V.R.Murty, Joint Secretary.

Note: The principal notification rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 248(E), dated the 31′ March, 2014 and subsequently amended vide the following notifications:-

Serial Number Notification Number Notification Date
1. G.S.R 440(E) 29th May, 2015
2. G.S.R 339(E) 7th April, 2017
----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Mere technical mistake in return cannot be a ground of disallowing a claim

Mere technical mistake made by assessee while filing up return cannot be a ground of disallowing the claim when such…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for land purchased in wife’s name SC stays HC Order

Denial of Capital gain deduction u/s 54B for agricultural land purchased in the name of wife Supreme Court stays High…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Surrounding circumstances, prudent investor behaviour key to creditworthiness

CIT(A) was justified in considering surrounding circumstances, the normal human conduct of a prudent investor, the probabilities to judge creditworthiness…

7 hours ago
  • GST

HC frowns at Provisional attachment orders under GST not lifted on expiry of one year

High Court frowns at Provisional attachment orders passed u/s 83(1) GST lifted only their illegality being questioned In a recent…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In Faceless assessment grant of opportunity of personal hearing not optional for AO

In Faceless assessment grant of opportunity of personal hearing is not optional at discretion of the Assessing Officer its waiver…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of return for complete scrutiny FY 2024-25

CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of return for compulsory scrutiny during FY 2024-25   CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of…

1 day ago