Term of Office of Officiating Chairperson NCLAT Shri Bansi Lal Bhat & Shri A.I.S. Cheema Judicial Member is extended by MCA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 20th April 2021
S.O.1662(E).—In continuation of this Ministry’s notifications S.O. 1049(E) dated 12th March, 2020, S.O. 2226(E) dated 06th July, 2020, S.O. 3168(E) dated 17th September, 2020, S.O. 3856(E) dated 28th October, 2020 and S.O. 192(E) dated 15th January, 2021, the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT is extended upto 18.04.2021 (i.e. his tenure ending date as completion of the age of 67 years.), or till the appointment of regular Chairperson in NCLAT, or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[F.No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt.Secy.
Note: The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O.1049(E), dated the 12th March, 2020.
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 20th April 2021
S.O.1663(E).—Consequent on the completion of the term of office of Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), NCLAT as officiating Chairperson, NCLAT on 18.04.2021, Central Government hereby appoints, Justice (Retd.) Shri A.I.S. Cheema, Judicial Member, NCLAT, as officiating Chairperson in terms of Rule 10(1) of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Member) Rules, 2020 for a period of three months with effect from 19.04.2021 or till appointment of regular Chairperson or until further orders, whichever is earliest.
[F.No. A-40012/1/2020-Ad.IV]
GYANESHWAR KUMAR SINGH, Jt.Secy
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…