ESIC

Supreme Court stays applicability of ESI to construction site workers / labour

Supreme Court stays applicability of ESI to construction site workers/labour

In a recent order, the Supreme Court has stayed the applicability of ESI to construction site workers/labour which was made applicable from 01.08.2015

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
2423 (2018) 07 abcaus.in SC

The Employees State Insurance Corporation had issued a Circular bearing No. P.12/11/11/60/20110-REV.II dated 31/07/2015 extending the benefit of ESI Scheme to the construction site workers, deployed in the implemented area with effect from 1st August, 2015.

The Bombay High Court had held that any person employed by or through an immediate employer or under the supervision of principal employer or his agent who is ordinarily part of the work of the establishment falls within the ambit of the Insurance Act for all purposes.  It was held that the applicability of the Insurance Act, cannot be stated to be in conflict with existing field and the other special laws.

However, the Supreme Court in 2018 issued an interim order staying the the order of the Bombay High Court and also the Circular dated 31st July, 2015 of the Employees State Insurance Corporation until further orders

Download Stay Order Click Here >>

Subsequent to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) in 2018 issued a clarification that no ESI contribution can be collected from the construction site worker and from their employers during the period of stay and also no benefits could be extended to such workers during the corresponding benefit period.

Thereafter, in January 2023, a Writ Petition was filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India challenging the notices being issued by various Regional Officers of the ESIC. The Hon’ble Supreme Court ordered as under:

“We clarify that the adjudication proceedings which are pending before the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation authorities will be restricted to those employees who are covered under the Circular No. P-12(11) -11/27/99-Ins.IV dated 14.06.1999, i.e., workers who are employed on regular employment and not those employed periodically or on temporary basis.”

The ESIC had issued an Instruction dated 14.06.1999 wherein it was observed that in construction industry the work is carried out through the construction workers at the construction sites where the projects are situated. The workers engaged in it are mobile and migratory in nature. The criteria and duration of employment also vary from work to work. It was stated that the existing scheme under the ESI Act was neither applicable nor suitable for workers engaged in construction sites. Therefore, for coverage of ESI on construction workers a detailed guidelines were issued which in principle covers workers who are on regular employment.

In view of the above, the ESIC in its Instruction dated 03.04.2023 has advised field units to strictly comply with the orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2023 while following the instruction dated 14.06.1999 and 26.09.2018 till the final outcome of the case pending in Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

4 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

13 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

2 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago