ESIC

Supreme Court stays applicability of ESI to construction site workers / labour

Supreme Court stays applicability of ESI to construction site workers/labour

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2423 (2018) 07 SC

The Employees State Insurance Corporation had issued a Circular bearing No. P.12/11/11/60/20110-REV.II dated 31/07/2015 extending the benefit of ESI Scheme to the construction site workers, deployed in the implemented area with effect from 1st August, 2015.

The Bombay High Court had held that any person employed by or through an immediate employer or under the supervision of principal employer or his agent who is ordinarily part of the work of the establishment falls within the ambit of the Insurance Act for all purposes.  It was held that the applicability of the Insurance Act, cannot be stated to be in conflict with existing field and the other special laws.

However, the Supreme Court had issued an interim order staying the the order of the Bombay High Court and also the Circular dated 31st July, 2015 of the Employees State Insurance Corporation until further orders

Download Stay Order Click Here >>

Subsequent to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) had issued a clarification that no ESI contribution can be collected from the construction site worker and from their employers during the period of stay and also no benefits could be extended to such workers during the corresponding benefit period.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

HC dismissed appeal against inadequacy of sentence in income tax prosecution cases

Appeal against inadequacy of sentence passed by special court in income tax prosecution cases dismissed by High Court  In a…

6 hours ago
  • ICSI

ICSI launches CS Mitr Scheme to give incentive for student registrations

ICSI launches CS Mitr Scheme to give incentive for getting student registered in Executive Programme ICSI has launched CS Mitr…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence no merger with order u/s 143(3) – ITAT

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence the doctrine of merger with order u/s 143(3) do not arise -…

24 hours ago
  • GST

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision to disclose route of transportation of goods

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision which bounds selling dealer to disclose route to be taken during transportation…

1 day ago
  • Companies Act

Restrictions on use of words “Nidhi Limited”-The Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2024

Restrictions on use of words Nidhi Limited unless declared as such under section 406(1). Nidhi (Amendment) Rules 2024 MINISTRY OF…

1 day ago
  • Companies Act

MCA prescribes period & fee for updating directors personal mobile number & email

MCA prescribes period and fee for updating of Directors personal mobile number or email address by e-form DIR-3 KYC  MINISTRY…

1 day ago