Circular No. 1025/13/2016-CX
F. No. 354/25/2016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Tax Research Unit
New Delhi, the 22nd April, 2016
To,
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All);
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise (All);
All Director Generals of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax
Sir / Madam,
Subject: Imposition of Central Excise duty on jewellery – Constitution of sub-committee of the High Level Committee -regarding
In continuation to the Circular No. 102119/2016-CX dated 21.03.2016 , issued vide F. No. 354/25/2016-TRU , the composition of the Sub-Committee referred to therein would be as under:
(i) Ashok Lahiri, Chairman.
(ii) Shri Gautam Ray,
(iii) Shri Rohan Shah, Legal expert [Managing Partner, Economic Laws Practice].
(iv) Shri Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Joint Secretary [Department of Commerce].
(v) Shri Alok Shukla, Joint Secretary [Tax Research Unit, Central Board of Excise and Customs, Department of Revenue].
2. Names of the trade representatives in the Sub-Committee would be decided in consultation of with Ashok Lahiri, Chairman of the Sub-Committee.
3. Terms of reference of the Sub-Committee will include the issues related to compliance procedure for the excise duty, including records to be maintained , operating procedures and any other issues that may be relevant.
4. All associations will be given an opportunity to submit representation before the sub-committee in writing and the all India associations to state their case in person.
5. Any further communications with the regard to the aforesaid Sub-Committee may be sent through e-mail to highlevelcommittee@gmail.com or by post addressed to the Office of the High Level Committee (HLC), Suite No . 215, The Janpath Hotel, Janpath Road, Opp. BSNL Building, New Delhi-110 001.
6. Wide publicity may be given to this Hindi version would follow.
Yours faithfully,
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…