Excise/Custom

Excise on Jewellery-Trade Representatives Nominated to sub committee of the High Level Committee. Circular No. 1030/18/2016 dated 18-05-2016

Excise on Jewellery-Trade Representatives Nominated to sub committee of the High Level Committee. 

Circular No. 1030/18/2016-CX

F. No.35412512016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Tax Research Unit
***

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

To,
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All);
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise (All);
All Director Generals of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax

Sir I Madam ,

Subject: Imposition of Central Excise duty on jewellery-Constitution of sub-committee of the High Level Committee -regarding.

In continuation to the Circular No.1025/13/2016-CX dated 22.04.2016 issued vide F. No. 354/25/2016-TRU, the following trade representatives are nominated as members of the aforesaid Sub-Committee:

  1. Shri Konal Doshi, past Convenor, Jewellery panel, GJEPC [Mobile-9820124106; Mail- doshi.konal@gmail.com];
  2. Shri Ashok Minawala, past Chairman, AIGJF, [Mobile-9821020011; Mail­                                           ashok .minawala@gmail.com]; and
  3. Shri Fatehchand Ranka, Chairman, All India Action Committee on Jewellery, AIACJ [Mobile- 9823082661; Mail- fatehchand @rankajewellerspvtltd .com , fatehchand@gmail.com].

2. Wide publicity may be given to this circular. Hindi version would follow.

Yours faithfully,

(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago