Excise/Custom

Excise on Jewellery-Trade Representatives Nominated to sub committee of the High Level Committee. Circular No. 1030/18/2016 dated 18-05-2016

Excise on Jewellery-Trade Representatives Nominated to sub committee of the High Level Committee. 

Circular No. 1030/18/2016-CX

F. No.35412512016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Tax Research Unit
***

New Delhi, the 18th May, 2016

To,
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All);
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise (All);
All Director Generals of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax

Sir I Madam ,

Subject: Imposition of Central Excise duty on jewellery-Constitution of sub-committee of the High Level Committee -regarding.

In continuation to the Circular No.1025/13/2016-CX dated 22.04.2016 issued vide F. No. 354/25/2016-TRU, the following trade representatives are nominated as members of the aforesaid Sub-Committee:

  1. Shri Konal Doshi, past Convenor, Jewellery panel, GJEPC [Mobile-9820124106; Mail- doshi.konal@gmail.com];
  2. Shri Ashok Minawala, past Chairman, AIGJF, [Mobile-9821020011; Mail­                                           ashok .minawala@gmail.com]; and
  3. Shri Fatehchand Ranka, Chairman, All India Action Committee on Jewellery, AIACJ [Mobile- 9823082661; Mail- fatehchand @rankajewellerspvtltd .com , fatehchand@gmail.com].

2. Wide publicity may be given to this circular. Hindi version would follow.

Yours faithfully,

(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

7 days ago