Extension of RoSCTL scheme validity from 31.03.2020 to 31.03.2021 or until RoSCTL scheme is merged with RoDTEP scheme, whichever is earlier
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
New Delhi, the 5th October, 2020
G.S.R. 615(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 13/2020-Customs, dated the 14th February, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 119(E), dated the 14th February, 2020, namely:-
In the said notification, in paragraph 2, in clause (1) in sub-clause (c), for the figures, letters and word “31st March, 2020”, the figures, letters and words “31st March, 2021 or until such date the RoSCTL scheme is merged with the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products scheme, whichever is earlier”, shall be substituted.
[F. No. 605/14/2020-DBK]
GOPAL KRISHNA JHA, Director (Drawback)
Note: The principal notification No. 13/2020-Customs, dated the 14th February, 2020 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 119(E), dated the 14thFebruary, 2020
For registration u/s 12AA if Commissioner’s satisfaction is limited to the objects of the Institution, or also to genuineness of…
Over 30 approvals u/s 153D granted within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind – Bombay High Court In a…
When AO invoked provisions of section 37(1) to disallow purchases, provisions of section 69C of the Act are not applicable…
ITAT refuses to accept opening cash as source of cash deposit as assessee was not subject to audit and cash…
Mere preparation of income tax notice and forwarding the same for dispatch is not effective issuance of notice until it…
Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…