Excise/Custom

Jeweller excise registration time limit extended to 31-07-2016. Excise duty payment liability will be from 1st March, 2016. CBEC Circular 1033/21/20016

Circular No. 1033/21/2016-CX

F. 354/25/2016-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Tax Research Unit

New Delhi, the 1st July, 2016

To,
Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (All);

Principal Chief Commissioners I Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise (All);
All Director Generals of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax

Sir / Madam,

Subject: Imposition of Central Excise duty on jewellery- Constitution of sub-committee of the High Level Committee -regarding.

Kindly refer to the Circular No. 102119/2016-CX dated 21.03.2016 and Circular No.1026/14/2016 dated 23.04.2016 , both issued vide F. No. 354/25/2016 – TRU.

2. In this regard, the time limit for taking central excise registration of an establishment by a jeweller is being extended up to 31.07.2016.

3. The liability for payment of central excise duty will be with effect from 1st March, 2016. However, assessee jewellers may make the payment of excise duty for the months of March, 2016; April, 2016 and May, 2016 along with the payment of excise duty for the month of June, 2016 upto the extended date of 31.07.2016.

4. Wide publicity may be given to this Difficulty, if any, in implementing the circular should be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.

Yours faithfully

Anurag Sehgal
Under Secretary

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

13 hours ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Unless medical certificate are held forged & fictitious, appeal can’t be rejected on ground of delay

Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…

4 days ago
  • DGFT

One Star Export House status allowed based on export performance in two FYs

FTP 2023 amended to allow One Star Export House status to applicants (other than for Gems & Jewelry Sector) based…

4 days ago