Finance Ministry

Increase in threshold monetary limits for filing Appeals – CBDT/CBIC Circulars

Increase in threshold monetary limits for filing Departmental Appeals at Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and the Supreme Court

Major Steps taken for Reducing Tax Litigations 

In order to reduce the long pending grievances of taxpayers and to minimise litigations pertaining to tax matters and to facilitate the Ease of Doing Business, Government of India has decided to increase the threshold monetary limits for filing Departmental Appeals at various levels, be it Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and the Supreme Court in the following manner :-

Sl. No. Appeal Fora Present limit for filing appeal

(In Rs.)

Enhanced limit

(In Rs.)

1. ITAT / CESTAT 10 lakhs 20 lakhs
2. High Courts 20 lakhs 50 lakhs
3. Supreme Court 25 lakhs 1 Crore

 

This is a major step in the direction of litigation management of both direct and indirect taxes as it will effectively reduce minor litigations and help the Department to focus on high value litigations.

In case of CBDT, out of total cases filed by the Department in ITAT, 34% of cases will be withdrawn. In case of High Courts, 48% of cases will be withdrawn and in case of Supreme Court 54% of cases will be withdrawn. The total percentage of reduction of litigation from Department’s side will get reduced by 41%. However, this will not apply in such cases where substantial point of law is involved.

Similarly, in case of CBIC, out of total cases filed by the Department in CESTAT, 16% of cases will be withdrawn. In case of High Courts, 22% of cases will be withdrawn and in case of Supreme Court 21% of cases will be withdrawn. The total percentage of reduction of litigation from Department’s side will get reduced by 18%. However, this will not apply in such cases where substantial point of law is involved.

This step will also reduce future litigation flow from the Department side.

Source: PIB

Read CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 and CBIC Instruction dated 11th July 2018 as issued in this regard.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report by a CA from Tax Year 2026-27

Form 26 to replace Form 3CD of tax audit report from Tax Year 2026-27 Draft Form 26 has been issued…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

When no addition is made on the basis of reasons recorded, reopening is bad in law

When AO do not make any addition on the basis of the reasons on which the reopening was done, the…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

No separate compensation for loss of love and affection under MV Act – SC

Under MV Act separate compensation can not be granted under the head “loss of love and affection” – Supreme Court…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Trust accredited by National Open School eligible for registration u/s 12AB & u/s 80G

Trust accredited by National Institute of Open Schooling eligible for registration u/s.12AB and u/s 80G of the Act. In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Covid Period to be excluded as per decision of Supreme Court

Delay in furnishing Form 10B – Period between 15.03.2020 till 20.08.2022 to be excluded as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty in terms of section 273B

Section 271AAB does not grant any immunity from penalty even if the assessee was able to show some reasonable cause…

4 days ago