Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Three CBI Courts designated as Special Courts under PMLA in West Bengal

Three CBI Courts designated as Special Courts under PMLA in the State of West Bengal

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 1st July, 2024

S.O. 2515(E).—In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003) and in consultation with the Chief Justice of High Court of Judicature at Calcutta, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 372(E), dated the 5th February, 2016 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii), namely:-

In the said notification, in the Table, against serial number 29 relating to the State of West Bengal, after the existing entries in Columns (3) and (4), the following entries shall be inserted, namely:-

(3) (4)
Court of Special Judge, CBI Court No. 2, Bichar Bhawan, Kolkata The entire State of West Bengal
Court of Special Judge, CBI Court No. 3, Bichar Bhawan, Kolkata. The entire State of West Bengal.
Court of Special Judge, CBI Court No. 4, Bichar Bhawan, Kolkata The entire State of West Bengal.

[F. No. C-18015/3/2013-Ad.ED (Part-I)]

RAJEEV LOCHAN, Under Secy

Note: The principal Notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,
sub-section (ii) vide number S.O. 372(E), dated the 5th February, 2016.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80P denied as return not filed u/s 139(1) but in response to notice u/s 148

Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…

13 hours ago
  • GST

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income

Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers

Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Compliance history of supplier can’t be used to invalidate genuine business transactions of buyer

Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…

3 days ago