Constitution of GST Feedback and Action Room FAR wef 26-06-2017
To reply the queries of the taxpayers and tax officials and to deal with issues related to the implementation of Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN), Government has constituted a GST Feedback and Action Room (FAR) w.e.f. 26-06-2017. Main purpose of FAR is reviewing the information, calls, media inputs etc received from Ministries, State Governments, field formations, social media, news channels, emails etc.
A team of officers monitor various media viz., newspapers, news channels, social media like twitter, facebook etc., emails received from various government departments and field formations and report them on Real Time Basis to the Revenue secretary (through an Officer on Special Duty to the Revenue Secretary), Chairperson CBEC (through an Officer on Special Duty to Chairperson), Member (Administration), GSTN or any other senior officer for providing the inputs. The FAR has multi-line telephone numbers which are available in the control room and these numbers have been informed to the Central and States GST officers. The emails received from the Ministries, State Governments and field formations are forwarded to the respective sections for information and feedback. This was stated by Shri Santosh Kumar Gangwar, Minister of State for Finance in written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.
*****
DSM/SBS/KA
AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…
Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…
High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…
The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…
Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…
Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…