GST

Non constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh-High Court calls personal affidavit from Principal Secretary

Non constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal in the State of Uttar Pradesh-High Court calls personal affidavit from Principal Secretary on reasons for delay and steps taken till date.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2418 (2018) 07 HC

The instant writ petition had been filed against the proceedings under Section 129 (3) of the U P GST Act 2017 (the Act). 

The petitioner was a seller at Uttar Pradesh (UP) who had affected certain sales to a registered dealer situated within the State of UP against the tax invoice. However, the goods handed over to the transporter was intercepted by GST Officials and a detention memo was issued on the allegation  that the goods was not accompanied by the E-way bill.  The goods was seized and a penalty order under Section 129 (3) was passed. 

Against the order passed under Section 129 (3) the petitioner went in appeal under Section 107(1) of the Act, before the Additional Commissioner (Appeal). The appeal was dismissed by confirming the order of penalty passed and the petitioner was directed to deposit the disputed amount.

The Petitioner had filed the present writ against this order of First Appellate Authority and contended that though Section 109,110,111 and 112 of the Act provides the Constitution of appellate Tribunal and procedure before the appellate Tribunal etc. but till date no appellate Tribunal had been constituted by the State.

The Standing Counsel representing the UP State contended that it was only the union to constitute the appellate Tribunal and not alone the State of UP.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that in any case the constitution of the Tribunal was necessary and in this regard earlier also the Court had issued the directions for the constitution of the Tribunal. 

The Hon’ble High Court expressed surprise that even after completion of one year from the date of introduction of the GST no appellate Tribunal has been constituted. 

The Hon’ble High Court directed that the Principal Secretary (Tax and Institutional Registration) Civil Secretariat, Lucknow to file a personal affidavit providing all details with regard to non establishment of the Tribunal till date and the steps taken by the respondent authorities. 

As interim protection the Hon’ble High Court directing for release of the seized goods along with the vehicle on furnishing of bank guarantee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

5 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

1 week ago