GST

SC declines to quash goods seizure order under UP GST Act when AC had sufficient reasons

Supreme Court declines to quash goods seizure order under UP GST Act when Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons to pass the order. 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2345 (2018) (05) SC

Vacation Bench of the Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the order passed by the Allahabad High Court with respect to seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the UP GST Act 2017 which was transported from Delhi to Siliguri (West Bengal).

The petitioner by way of SLP had prayed for quashing the seizure order.

The Allahabad High Court after going through the reasons recorded in the seizure order had opined that prima facie, the Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons at the time of inception to pass the impugned orders.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago