Supreme Court declines to quash goods seizure order under UP GST Act when Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons to pass the order.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2345 (2018) (05) SC
Vacation Bench of the Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the order passed by the Allahabad High Court with respect to seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the UP GST Act 2017 which was transported from Delhi to Siliguri (West Bengal).
The petitioner by way of SLP had prayed for quashing the seizure order.
The Allahabad High Court after going through the reasons recorded in the seizure order had opined that prima facie, the Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons at the time of inception to pass the impugned orders.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
----------- Similar Posts: -----------Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…
Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…
Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…
Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…
Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …