Supreme Court declines to quash goods seizure order under UP GST Act when Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons to pass the order.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2345 (2018) (05) SC
Vacation Bench of the Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the order passed by the Allahabad High Court with respect to seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the UP GST Act 2017 which was transported from Delhi to Siliguri (West Bengal).
The petitioner by way of SLP had prayed for quashing the seizure order.
The Allahabad High Court after going through the reasons recorded in the seizure order had opined that prima facie, the Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons at the time of inception to pass the impugned orders.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Frequently asked Questions on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026. CBDT has released a FAQs on…
Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified. Rule come into force on the 16th day of August,…
Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act authorising arrest of a person has to be communicated to him before arrest–…
Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 where no…
The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…
For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…