Supreme Court declines to quash goods seizure order under UP GST Act when Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons to pass the order.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2345 (2018) (05) SC
Vacation Bench of the Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the order passed by the Allahabad High Court with respect to seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the UP GST Act 2017 which was transported from Delhi to Siliguri (West Bengal).
The petitioner by way of SLP had prayed for quashing the seizure order.
The Allahabad High Court after going through the reasons recorded in the seizure order had opined that prima facie, the Assistant Commissioner had sufficient reasons at the time of inception to pass the impugned orders.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…