ICAI

Disciplinary proceedings against managing committee of ICAI Chandigarh Branch stayed by Punjab and Haryana High Court

Disciplinary proceedings against managing committee of ICAI Chandigarh Branch stayed by P&H High Court in a case of democratic selection of branch chairman.

This indeed puts a question mark on the endeavour of ICAI in upholding the democratic principles enshrined in the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and rules governing it.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
1026 (2016) 09 HC

Facts of the Case:
In the meeting of the Executive/Managing Committee of the Chandigarh Branch of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) of Northern India Regional Council (NIRC), the elected Chairman resigned. The Vice-Chairman was requested to take over, however, on his refusal, the name of CA Sahil Singla who was a member of the executive committee was proposed by the outgoing Chairman and was accepted and he was requested to take over as Chairman of the Branch. .

However, ICAI was irked by this decision of the Managing Committee and on this action of the Executive Committee, the Institute had started disciplinary proceedings against the all the eight members of the Executive Committee of the Chandigarh Branch.

A Writ Petition was filed by the Managing Committee of Chandigrah Branch along with its members seeking quashing of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the ICAI challenging that there is no power vested with ICAI to initiate disciplinary proceedings for selection of Branch Chairman by its executive committee.

The High Court while issuing notices to the respondent(s) including ICAI, stayed the disciplinary action against the members of the Managing/Executive Committee of the Chandigarh Branch.

Also, the High Court took assurance by the respondents that meantime all the bills of Chandigarh Branch shall be cleared by the Central Unit of ICAI.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Amendments proposed in TDS and related provisions by Budget 2026-27

Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…

13 hours ago
  • Custom

Baggage Rules 2026 rationalised, other newly introduced Custom reforms

Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…

24 hours ago