ICAI

Disciplinary proceedings against managing committee of ICAI Chandigarh Branch stayed by Punjab and Haryana High Court

Disciplinary proceedings against managing committee of ICAI Chandigarh Branch stayed by P&H High Court in a case of democratic selection of branch chairman.

This indeed puts a question mark on the endeavour of ICAI in upholding the democratic principles enshrined in the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and rules governing it.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
1026 (2016) 09 HC

Facts of the Case:
In the meeting of the Executive/Managing Committee of the Chandigarh Branch of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) of Northern India Regional Council (NIRC), the elected Chairman resigned. The Vice-Chairman was requested to take over, however, on his refusal, the name of CA Sahil Singla who was a member of the executive committee was proposed by the outgoing Chairman and was accepted and he was requested to take over as Chairman of the Branch. .

However, ICAI was irked by this decision of the Managing Committee and on this action of the Executive Committee, the Institute had started disciplinary proceedings against the all the eight members of the Executive Committee of the Chandigarh Branch.

A Writ Petition was filed by the Managing Committee of Chandigrah Branch along with its members seeking quashing of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the ICAI challenging that there is no power vested with ICAI to initiate disciplinary proceedings for selection of Branch Chairman by its executive committee.

The High Court while issuing notices to the respondent(s) including ICAI, stayed the disciplinary action against the members of the Managing/Executive Committee of the Chandigarh Branch.

Also, the High Court took assurance by the respondents that meantime all the bills of Chandigarh Branch shall be cleared by the Central Unit of ICAI.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago