Income Tax

No household expenses withdrawal claiming husband paid all expenses not justified – ITAT

Addition for no withdrawal for household expenses-Contention that husband met out all expenses did not justify nil withdrawal by assessee wife – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2549 (2018) 09 ITAT

No household expenses withdrawal claiming husband paid all expenses

The Case was selected for scrutiny through Computer Assistance Scrutiny Section (CASS) and notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) were duly served upon the appellant assessee along with questionnaire.

The Assessing Officer (AO) while examining the audited capital account observed that during the relevant assessment year, the assessee had not made any withdrawal for household expenses.

Not satisfied with the reply of the assessee, the AO made an addition towards low house hold withdrawals for Rs. 1,50,000/-

The CIT(A) maintained the addition.

The Tribunal noted that as per the audited capital account no withdrawals were shown by the assessee for household expenses and it was claimed that the household withdrawals of her husband was sufficient.

The Tribunal observed that no cash had been withdrawn by the assessee towards household expenses.

The Tribunal opined that the contention that assessee’s husband took care of total household expenditure could not justify that the assessee was not required to make any withdrawal for household expenses.

The Tribunal confirmed the findings of CIT(A) for the addition of Rs.1,00,000/-.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Also Read:

Cash flow statement rejected for no household drawings Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT can’t restrict power of CIT u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years – High Court

CBDT Circular can’t restrict powers of Income Tax Authority u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years In a recent…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan

Benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan allowed as assessee fulfilled conditions of CBDT Circular…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Ambiguous penalty notices cannot be foundation of imposition of any penalty – SC

Ambiguous notices without striking off the irrelevant limb cannot be the foundation of imposition of any penalty – Supreme Court…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court upheld application of peak…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Actual use of asset is not the sole test for allowability of depreciation – ITAT

Actual use of asset not the sole test for allowability of depreciation and it may be allowed when business only…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

1 week ago