Income Tax

No household expenses withdrawal claiming husband paid all expenses not justified – ITAT

Addition for no withdrawal for household expenses-Contention that husband met out all expenses did not justify nil withdrawal by assessee wife – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2549 (2018) 09 ITAT

No household expenses withdrawal claiming husband paid all expenses

The Case was selected for scrutiny through Computer Assistance Scrutiny Section (CASS) and notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) were duly served upon the appellant assessee along with questionnaire.

The Assessing Officer (AO) while examining the audited capital account observed that during the relevant assessment year, the assessee had not made any withdrawal for household expenses.

Not satisfied with the reply of the assessee, the AO made an addition towards low house hold withdrawals for Rs. 1,50,000/-

The CIT(A) maintained the addition.

The Tribunal noted that as per the audited capital account no withdrawals were shown by the assessee for household expenses and it was claimed that the household withdrawals of her husband was sufficient.

The Tribunal observed that no cash had been withdrawn by the assessee towards household expenses.

The Tribunal opined that the contention that assessee’s husband took care of total household expenditure could not justify that the assessee was not required to make any withdrawal for household expenses.

The Tribunal confirmed the findings of CIT(A) for the addition of Rs.1,00,000/-.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Also Read:

Cash flow statement rejected for no household drawings Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

10 hours ago
  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

5 days ago