Income Tax

Addition u/s 41(1) made on the ground of untraceable creditors-There was not cessation of liability-High Court

Addition u/s 41(1) made on the ground of untraceable creditors-the liability had not ceased or any advantage was taken. High Court upheld deletion made by ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2240 (2018) (03) HC

The Revenue was aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal  (ITAT) in deletion the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 41 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) for untraceable creditors.

The grievance of the Assessing Officer was that the assessee had not filed any evidence before the Assessing Officer with regard to the actual existence of these liabilities or to show that the liabilities existed.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the necessary ingredients for invoking the provisions of Section 141 are two folds; firstly, there should have been a cessation of the trading liability and secondly that some benefit in respect of the trade liability had been taken by the assessee. Whereas, there was nothing on record to show that there have been cessation of trading liability or that some benefits had been taken in respect of the trading liability by the assessee.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that out of total amount approximately 86% had still remained unrecoverable as the creditors were untraceable and in any event, it could not be said that the liability had ceased or that any advantage had been taken by the assessee on account of this.

The Hon’ble High Court also noted that the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court had came to the conclusion that merely because creditor could not be traced on date when verification was made, is not a ground to conclude that there cessation of liability because cessation of liability has to be cessation in law, of debt to be paid by assessee to the creditor and, therefore, Section 41(1) of the Act could not have been invoked.

The appeal was dismissed.

 

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Addition u/s 68 deleted as AO failed to find any discrepancy in details submitted

Addition u/s 68 deleted as AO failed to find any discrepancy in details of creditors submitted by the assessee In…

3 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank-Empanelment of retired officers as Concurrent auditors

Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank - Empanelment of retired officers of banks as Concurrent auditors on contract basis Jharkhand Rajya Gramin…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Book Profit u/s 115JB can not be computed as per cash basis of accounting

Book Profit u/s 115JB to be computed as per Profit & Loss Account prepared under Schedule III of the Companies…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order not in conformity of Faceless Assessment Scheme if not est? – ITAT remands case

Order not in conformity of Faceless Assessment Scheme 2019 if not est? - ITAT remands the case in view of…

2 days ago
  • FCRA

Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.09.2024

Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.09.2024 Home Ministry has decided to extend the validity of FCRA…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 68 to 69B applicable only if assessee is required to maintain books of accounts

Provisions of section 68 to 69B applicable only if assessee is required to maintain books of accounts under provisions of…

3 days ago