Income Tax

Allahabad HC admits PIL against creation of ITAT Varanasi Bench

Allahabad HC admits PIL against creation of ITAT Varanasi Bench alleging non constitution of permanant benches at Allahabad regularly to dispose of cases

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2384 (2018) 06 HC

Allahabad High Court has admitted a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Income Tax Bar Association, Allahabad against the creation of a circuit bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Varanasi.

It has been averred that the said creation was made without addressing the grievances of the petitioner Bar Association with regard to non appointment of members for the permanent seat of the Tribunal at Allahabad. 

The territorial jurisdiction for Allahabad Bench is for approximately more than 20 districts. It has been contended that four members are supposed to constitute two division benches in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal; Whereas not a single permanent member has been posted for the last 10 years except for a few month when the members from other Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are sent to hold the bench that too for a short time.

It has been submitted that due to the lack of permanent members, two permanent Division Bench in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are not constituted regularly so as to dispose of the cases/appeals pertaining to the jurisdiction of the Allahabad Bench.

It was further submitted that the pendency in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is only of approximately 872 cases which is not much so as to warrant creation of a circuit bench at Varanasi. Lots of public money spent in creating permanent infrastructure at Allahabad is wasted simply for non appointment/designation of members permanently and further the public money would be wasted in creating new infrastructure for the circuit bench Varanasi. 

It was alleged that the notification issued in making amendment of the Standing order dated 16.09.1996 by the notification dated 21.05.2018 thus runs against the public interest. 

The Hon’ble High Court admitted the Petition calling it a serious issue and directed issue of notices.

Download Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

SC issues directions to Committee of Creditors to protect interests of homebuyers

Supreme Court issues directions to Committee of Creditors for safeguard interests of homebuyers in Insolvency proceedings In a recent judgment,…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 69C not applicable on addition for disallowance of expenditure of salary

Provisions of section 69C not applicable for addition made on account of disallowance of expenditure on employee salary and Wages…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

HC declines to direct ITD to investigate Tax Evasion Petition due to limitation

High Court declines to direct ITD to investigate allegations of tax evasion as per Tax Evasion Petition due to limitation…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

SLP dismissed against condoning delay in filing Form 10B as CA wasn’t aware of online filing

Condoning delay in filing audit report in Form 10B as CA of the assessee was not aware of newly introduced…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No bar prohibiting simultaneous penalty u/s 271B and 271A of Income Tax Act

There is no bar in penalty u/s 271B for non-audit u/s 44AB if penalty u/s 271A is also levied for…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash book cannot be rejected when availability of stock is not disputed

Cash book cannot be rejected when availability of stock in trade is not disputed as per stock register which is…

14 hours ago