Income Tax

Allahabad HC admits PIL against creation of ITAT Varanasi Bench

Allahabad HC admits PIL against creation of ITAT Varanasi Bench alleging non constitution of permanant benches at Allahabad regularly to dispose of cases

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2384 (2018) 06 HC

Allahabad High Court has admitted a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Income Tax Bar Association, Allahabad against the creation of a circuit bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Varanasi.

It has been averred that the said creation was made without addressing the grievances of the petitioner Bar Association with regard to non appointment of members for the permanent seat of the Tribunal at Allahabad. 

The territorial jurisdiction for Allahabad Bench is for approximately more than 20 districts. It has been contended that four members are supposed to constitute two division benches in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal; Whereas not a single permanent member has been posted for the last 10 years except for a few month when the members from other Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are sent to hold the bench that too for a short time.

It has been submitted that due to the lack of permanent members, two permanent Division Bench in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are not constituted regularly so as to dispose of the cases/appeals pertaining to the jurisdiction of the Allahabad Bench.

It was further submitted that the pendency in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is only of approximately 872 cases which is not much so as to warrant creation of a circuit bench at Varanasi. Lots of public money spent in creating permanent infrastructure at Allahabad is wasted simply for non appointment/designation of members permanently and further the public money would be wasted in creating new infrastructure for the circuit bench Varanasi. 

It was alleged that the notification issued in making amendment of the Standing order dated 16.09.1996 by the notification dated 21.05.2018 thus runs against the public interest. 

The Hon’ble High Court admitted the Petition calling it a serious issue and directed issue of notices.

Download Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Order rejecting stay of income tax demand should recite merits if it is a case for stay or not

In an order rejecting stay of income tax demand there should be a recital of the merits whether it is…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT extends due date of tax audit for FY 2025-26 to 21st October 2026

CBDT has extended the due date for furnishing Return of Income for Assessment Year 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) in respect of…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Denying accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable

Denying the accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of a procedural delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable…

1 week ago
  • Empanelment

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs at Central Registrar of Cooperative Society

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs in the Office of Central Registrar of Cooperative Society on contractual basis The office…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t take two different stands on immunity u/s 270AA(2) for a same transaction

Immunity u/s 270AA(2) in respect of a single transaction can not be denied to one assessee when the penalty was…

1 week ago