Income Tax

CA alleges false implication by client. High Court admits appeal, stays proceedings in Trial Court

Chartered Accountant alleges false implication by his client. High Court stays proceedings in Trial Court and admits appeal

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2627 (2018) (11) HC

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:

A Chartered Accountant had filed an application under section 482 of CrPC against the State and his client as the opposite parties.

The CA submitted that an Income Tax raid was conducted u/s 132 of the Income tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in the office of his client in which the client had implicated the CA.

It was submitted that he being a Chartered Accountant, had performed his functions only as per requirement of his job and had been falsely implicated by the client to create defence in favour of himself before the Income Tax Department. 

As a result an FIR was lodged by the Income Tax Department at the Police Station against the CA under Sections 406,420,468,469 and 471/34 IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust, Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, forgery for the purpose of cheating, forgery for purpose of harming reputation, using as genuine a forged document and Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.

The Hon’ble High Court admitted the application and issued notice to the said client of the chartered accountant.

The High Court further directed that till the next date of listing of the case, further proceedings pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) with regard to the applicant CA shall remain stayed. 

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Draft assessment order cannot give rise to any enforceable demand 

In absence of a valid final assessment order passed within statutory time frame, draft assessment order cannot give rise to…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B if expenditure not claimed in Profit and Loss Account

No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

3 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

4 days ago