Income Tax

Disallowance 40(A)(3) for cash payment deleted when payee was new and refused cheque

Disallowance 40(A)(3) for cash payment deleted when payee was new. When genuiness of payment not doubted there was every possibility that party refused to cheques / Demand draft – ITAT 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2372 (2018) 06 ITAT

During the course of the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had made cash payment to few parties. The assessee pointed out that he was dealing with these parties for the first time and these persons were not ready to accept the same by cheque / demand draft, therefore, he had no choice but to make the payments in cash.

The Assessing Officer did not accept this contention of the assessee and disallowed the payments u/s 40(A)(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

On appeal, the CIT(A) observed that the transactions were not frequent and accepted the contention that the other party did not agree to cheque payment. The CIT (A) accordingly deleted addition.

The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had not doubted the genuiness of the expenditure. The AO had also not doubted that the assessee was not having any frequent transactions with these parties.

The Tribunal opined that there was every possibility that the parties must have refused to take the payment by cheques/ Demand draft.

Accordingly, the ITAT decline to interfere with the finding of the CIT (A) and rejected the ground of the Revenue.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

20 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago