Income Tax

Cash received over and above land registry price treated as capital gain for taxation purpose

Cash received over and above land registry price treated as capital gain for taxation purpose. Addition on account of unexplained income deleted – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2111 (2017) (11) ITAT

Brief Facts of the Case:
A sum of Rs. 12,50,000/- was deposited by the appellant assessee in his saving bank account jointly maintained with his wife. On being asked to explain the source of such cash deposit, the assessee stated that this amount was received on sale of agricultural land which was deposited in saving bank account.

However, the Assessing Officer found that as per the registry, the land was sold only for a sum of Rs. 3,81,964/-. He treated the excess amount of Rs. 8,68,036/- as unexplained income and made addition for this amount.

The First Appellate Authority (FAA/CIT-A) confirmed the addition.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The ITAT noted that admittedly, the property was, in fact, sold for a sum of Rs. 12,50,000/- but the sale deed was executed only for a sum of Rs.3,81,964/-. Bank account revealed that there was a single deposit of Rs. 12,50,000/- and the date of sale deed was also the same.

The ITAT opined that it proved the assessee’s contention that the sum of Rs. 12,50,000/- was infact received from the sale of the property which was deposited in the bank account.

Regarding the contention of the assessee that the land sold was an agricultural land and no capital gain was chargeable on its transfer, the Tribunal set aside the order and restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for examining the assessee’s contention.

The ITAT directed that if the assessee’s contention about the sale of property, being, an agricultural land is proved, then no addition should be made. In the otherwise scenario, the matter be decided as per law by treating full value of consideration at Rs.12.50 lacs.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago