Income Tax

CBDT reverts back four JCIT to DCIT in view of disciplinary/vigilance cases

CBDT reverts four Joint Commissioners of Income Tax back to their substantive post i.e. DCIT in view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against them,

F. No. A-32012/5/2019-Ad.VI
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
* * * * *

North Block New Delhi
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2019

OFFICE ORDER NO.131 OF 2019

In view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against the following officers , the Competent Authority has decided not to extend the term of ad-hoc appointment of the officers listed below to the post of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax . Accordingly , the following officers are reverted to their substantive post i.e. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax with immediate effect:

S. No.

Name of the Officers (S/Shri)

Civil Code

1.

Ashutosh Verma

99026

2.

Sanjeev Ghei

02533

3.

Jai Singh

04090

4 .

Waghmare Vipul Digambar

07113

2. The compliance report of this order may be forwarded to the Board and also to Database Cell at www.irsofficersonline.gov.in and www.incometax.gov.in by 17.06.2019.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow.

(Yogesh Sharma)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-23095474

Copy to: –

  1. Officer concerned through their Pr. CCIT (CCA) concerned .
  2. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, CBDT, New Delhi
  3. Zonal Account Officer , CBDT C/o Princip l CCIT (CCA) concerned.
  4. PSs to FM / MOS (Finance).
  5. PPSs to Revenue Secretary/Chairman ,  CBDT/Members ,  CBDT/ JS (Admn./CBDT) / JS (Revenue).
  6. Adviser to FM.
  7. Hindi Section for Hindi Version .
  8. Secretary General, IRS Association/ITGOAJ ITEF/ All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association .
  9. Commissioner of Income Tax (Media & TP) and official Spokesperson, CBDT
  10. Data Base Cell, CBDT, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Mentioning wrong place of delivery in e-way bill was human error – High Court

In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court has quashed the penalty order u/s 129 of UPGST Act 2017…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001- Clarification

CBDT has clarified the question as to what would be the Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased…

24 hours ago
  • GST

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A for furnishing details of outward supplies

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A- Form and manner of furnishing details of outward supplies GSTN has issued an advisory for FORM…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No Penalty u/s 271E on cash repayment of advances treated unexplained cash credits

Penalty u/s 271E can not be imposed on cash repayment of advances treated as unexplained cash credits. In a recent…

1 day ago
  • GST

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision in Kesoram

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision In Kesoram Industries and held that…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him – High Court

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him and relied upon by the Income Tax Department  during the…

2 days ago