Income Tax

CBDT reverts back four JCIT to DCIT in view of disciplinary/vigilance cases

CBDT reverts four Joint Commissioners of Income Tax back to their substantive post i.e. DCIT in view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against them,

F. No. A-32012/5/2019-Ad.VI
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
* * * * *

North Block New Delhi
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2019

OFFICE ORDER NO.131 OF 2019

In view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against the following officers , the Competent Authority has decided not to extend the term of ad-hoc appointment of the officers listed below to the post of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax . Accordingly , the following officers are reverted to their substantive post i.e. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax with immediate effect:

S. No.

Name of the Officers (S/Shri)

Civil Code

1.

Ashutosh Verma

99026

2.

Sanjeev Ghei

02533

3.

Jai Singh

04090

4 .

Waghmare Vipul Digambar

07113

2. The compliance report of this order may be forwarded to the Board and also to Database Cell at www.irsofficersonline.gov.in and www.incometax.gov.in by 17.06.2019.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow.

(Yogesh Sharma)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-23095474

Copy to: –

  1. Officer concerned through their Pr. CCIT (CCA) concerned .
  2. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, CBDT, New Delhi
  3. Zonal Account Officer , CBDT C/o Princip l CCIT (CCA) concerned.
  4. PSs to FM / MOS (Finance).
  5. PPSs to Revenue Secretary/Chairman ,  CBDT/Members ,  CBDT/ JS (Admn./CBDT) / JS (Revenue).
  6. Adviser to FM.
  7. Hindi Section for Hindi Version .
  8. Secretary General, IRS Association/ITGOAJ ITEF/ All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association .
  9. Commissioner of Income Tax (Media & TP) and official Spokesperson, CBDT
  10. Data Base Cell, CBDT, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

1 week ago