Income Tax

CBDT reverts back four JCIT to DCIT in view of disciplinary/vigilance cases

CBDT reverts four Joint Commissioners of Income Tax back to their substantive post i.e. DCIT in view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against them,

F. No. A-32012/5/2019-Ad.VI
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
* * * * *

North Block New Delhi
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2019

OFFICE ORDER NO.131 OF 2019

In view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against the following officers , the Competent Authority has decided not to extend the term of ad-hoc appointment of the officers listed below to the post of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax . Accordingly , the following officers are reverted to their substantive post i.e. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax with immediate effect:

S. No.

Name of the Officers (S/Shri)

Civil Code

1.

Ashutosh Verma

99026

2.

Sanjeev Ghei

02533

3.

Jai Singh

04090

4 .

Waghmare Vipul Digambar

07113

2. The compliance report of this order may be forwarded to the Board and also to Database Cell at www.irsofficersonline.gov.in and www.incometax.gov.in by 17.06.2019.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow.

(Yogesh Sharma)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-23095474

Copy to: –

  1. Officer concerned through their Pr. CCIT (CCA) concerned .
  2. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, CBDT, New Delhi
  3. Zonal Account Officer , CBDT C/o Princip l CCIT (CCA) concerned.
  4. PSs to FM / MOS (Finance).
  5. PPSs to Revenue Secretary/Chairman ,  CBDT/Members ,  CBDT/ JS (Admn./CBDT) / JS (Revenue).
  6. Adviser to FM.
  7. Hindi Section for Hindi Version .
  8. Secretary General, IRS Association/ITGOAJ ITEF/ All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association .
  9. Commissioner of Income Tax (Media & TP) and official Spokesperson, CBDT
  10. Data Base Cell, CBDT, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

14 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

4 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago