Income Tax

CBDT reverts back four JCIT to DCIT in view of disciplinary/vigilance cases

CBDT reverts four Joint Commissioners of Income Tax back to their substantive post i.e. DCIT in view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against them,

F. No. A-32012/5/2019-Ad.VI
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Direct Taxes)
* * * * *

North Block New Delhi
New Delhi, the 11th June, 2019

OFFICE ORDER NO.131 OF 2019

In view of pending disciplinary/vigilance cases against the following officers , the Competent Authority has decided not to extend the term of ad-hoc appointment of the officers listed below to the post of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax . Accordingly , the following officers are reverted to their substantive post i.e. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax with immediate effect:

S. No.

Name of the Officers (S/Shri)

Civil Code

1.

Ashutosh Verma

99026

2.

Sanjeev Ghei

02533

3.

Jai Singh

04090

4 .

Waghmare Vipul Digambar

07113

2. The compliance report of this order may be forwarded to the Board and also to Database Cell at www.irsofficersonline.gov.in and www.incometax.gov.in by 17.06.2019.

3. Hindi version of this order will follow.

(Yogesh Sharma)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel. 011-23095474

Copy to: –

  1. Officer concerned through their Pr. CCIT (CCA) concerned .
  2. Principal Chief Controller of Accounts, CBDT, New Delhi
  3. Zonal Account Officer , CBDT C/o Princip l CCIT (CCA) concerned.
  4. PSs to FM / MOS (Finance).
  5. PPSs to Revenue Secretary/Chairman ,  CBDT/Members ,  CBDT/ JS (Admn./CBDT) / JS (Revenue).
  6. Adviser to FM.
  7. Hindi Section for Hindi Version .
  8. Secretary General, IRS Association/ITGOAJ ITEF/ All India Income Tax SC & ST Employees Welfare Association .
  9. Commissioner of Income Tax (Media & TP) and official Spokesperson, CBDT
  10. Data Base Cell, CBDT, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

3 days ago