Income Tax

CIT approval u/s 153D in bulk draft assessment orders on a single day held mechanical

CIT approval u/s 153D in bulk draft assessment orders on a single day held to be mechanical approval vitiating entire proceedings.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3555 (2021) (10) ITAT

Important case law relied referred:
Shri Navin Jain vs. DCIT

In the instant case the assessee had taken an additional ground that the approval given by the JCIT u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to the order passed u/s 153A was without application of mind and in a mechanical manner, without appreciating the facts and not following the provisions/mandate of the section, which makes the order passed u/s 153A non est, void ab initio bad in law.

A search & seizure operation u/s 132 was conducted on a business group of cases and assessee was required to file income tax return u/s 153A of the Act.

As per the provisions of the Act, the Assessing Officer, before passing assessment order framed u/s 153A, 153C and 143(3), is required to take the approval from Joint CIT u/s 153D of the Act if the Assessing Officer is below the rank of Jt. CIT.

The Jt. CIT is required to see all search material including incriminating material, seized documents, appraisal report, enquiries made by the investigation wing and various enquiries made by the Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings and the replies submitted  by  the  assessee  and  after  due  application of mind and after ascertaining that the Assessing  Officer has appreciated the search material and other evidences in proper perspective has to give approval to the draft assessment  order and only after that Assessing Officer can pass the assessment order.

Before the Tribunal, the case of the assessee was that the Assessing Officer passed the draft assessment orders on the same day when approval u/s 153D was granted and final assessment order was also passed by the Assessing Officer on the same day.   

It was contended that as per this approval letter the Addl. CIT granted approval u/s 153D in bulk cases and it was humanly impossible to go through all draft assessment orders on a single day.

The assessee submitted that in another case, under similar facts and circumstances, the Tribunal had decided the issue in favour of the assessee and therefore, it was prayed that the additional ground of appeal may be allowed and assessment order be quashed.

The Tribunal noted that under similar facts and circumstances, the Tribunal on two occasions had held that granting of a mechanical approval u/s 153D of the Act vitiated the entire proceedings and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Following the view taken by the ITAT, the additional ground of  appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee and the  assessment  order was quashed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

14 hours ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

2 days ago