Income Tax

Claim for business loss due to theft allowed despite no FIR lodged with Police

Claim for business loss due to theft of cash allowed despite no FIR was lodged with Police Authorities in view of peculiar circumstances and also when Revenue had not suffered

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2635 (2018) (11) ITAT

The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on inter alia confirming the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of loss on account of theft of cash.

The assessee submitted that the amount claimed as loss was stolen out of cash money kept in the factory premises owing to business exigencies. It was explained that no FIR was registered with the police authorities to avoid an atmosphere of fear and uneasiness among the employees given its smallness in the context.

It was contended that the assessee was subjected to tax under the special provisions of Section 115JB of the Act and therefore such business loss had no impact on taxes per se as the tax liability under the MAT provisions stood more than the tax liability as per the normal provisions which was nil.

Thus, it was submitted that under the given facts and circumstances, such disallowance on account of business loss owing to theft was not justified.

The Tribunal examined the issue and observed that the assessee had pointed out existence of sufficient circumstances for bonafides of claim of business loss owing to theft. The assessee had also demonstrated that Revenue had not suffered any loss towards taxation by such claim of the assessee.

The Tribunal found merit in the claim of the assessee notwithstanding absence of FIR for such theft owing to peculiar circumstances.

Accordingly, the relevant ground of the assessee’s appeal was allowed.

 Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

E-Way Bill not present in vehicle only a technical violation. IGST Penalty order quashed

E-Way Bill not present in vehicle only a technical violation when E-Way Bill was downloaded prior to the interception of…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Address in PAN vital & decisive to determine territorial jurisdiction of High Court

Residence address of assessee mentioned in PAN registration details is vital and decisive to determine territorial jurisdiction of High Court…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Challenge to intimation passed u/s 143(1) calls for independent adjudication – ITAT

Challenge to intimation passed u/s 143(1) calls for independent adjudication in terms of statutory dictate of Section 246A(1)(a) of the…

20 hours ago
  • GST

Assessee writing ‘No’ to mark choice of personal hearing, have no legal consequence

Petitioner signifying 'No' in prescribed column to mark his choice to avail personal hearing, have no legal consequence. Opportunity of…

23 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI Guidance Note on Non-Compliances Observed by Quality Review Board

ICAI Guidance on Non-Compliances Observed by Quality Review Board During Quality Reviews ICAI has issued a Guidance on Non-Compliances Observed…

1 day ago
  • GST

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted

Order passed u/s 74 of UPGST Act quashed as opportunity of hearing not granted In a recent judgment and order…

2 days ago