Income Tax

Claim for business loss due to theft allowed despite no FIR lodged with Police

Claim for business loss due to theft of cash allowed despite no FIR was lodged with Police Authorities in view of peculiar circumstances and also when Revenue had not suffered

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2635 (2018) (11) ITAT

The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on inter alia confirming the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of loss on account of theft of cash.

The assessee submitted that the amount claimed as loss was stolen out of cash money kept in the factory premises owing to business exigencies. It was explained that no FIR was registered with the police authorities to avoid an atmosphere of fear and uneasiness among the employees given its smallness in the context.

It was contended that the assessee was subjected to tax under the special provisions of Section 115JB of the Act and therefore such business loss had no impact on taxes per se as the tax liability under the MAT provisions stood more than the tax liability as per the normal provisions which was nil.

Thus, it was submitted that under the given facts and circumstances, such disallowance on account of business loss owing to theft was not justified.

The Tribunal examined the issue and observed that the assessee had pointed out existence of sufficient circumstances for bonafides of claim of business loss owing to theft. The assessee had also demonstrated that Revenue had not suffered any loss towards taxation by such claim of the assessee.

The Tribunal found merit in the claim of the assessee notwithstanding absence of FIR for such theft owing to peculiar circumstances.

Accordingly, the relevant ground of the assessee’s appeal was allowed.

 Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Mediclaim amount not deductible from MACT award under medical expenses – SC

Amount of money received as Mediclaim not deductible from an award passed by MACT under the head of medical expenses.…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT jurisdiction is decided by location of AO passing the impugned order

Location of the assessing officer who passed the order shall decide the jurisdiction of the Bench of the Tribunal In…

4 days ago