Income Tax

Concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted on humanitarian grounds by ITAT

Concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted on humanitarian grounds as the assessee had died, his business was closed and his widow was depositing the quantum demand-ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2230 (2018) (03) ITAT

The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessment of the assessee had been made under section 144 of the Act which included unexplained cash deposits in his two bank accounts. Before the CIT(A), it was submitted that cash deposits in bank account was made out of cash withdrawals from the other account.

The CIT(A) accepted the contentions of the assessee and deleted the additions. However, The Tribunal upheld the addition made and that there was no commercial expediency for withdrawing substantial amount from one account and depositing the same in other account within a few days.  

The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the assessee.

The Assessing Officer issued a show cause notice under section 271(1)(c) which was replied by the assessee.However the AO did not found the reply convincing and accordingly he imposed penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect of unexplained cash deposit in bank.

The CIT(A) upheld the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Before the tribunal, it was stated that the assessee had died and copy of death certificate was produced. It was submitted that a petition was moved before the Assessing Officer by the wife of deceased assessee depositing part amount with regard to the quantum demand. The widow of deceased assessee had submitted to the AO that after the demise of her husband, the business of the assessee had stopped, she was an old aged widow and having health ailments and since she have already started depositing the amount in Government account relating to quantum demand, on humanitarian grounds the penalty in the case of deceased assessee may be cancelled.

The Tribunal observed that the entire business activities of the deceased assessee was closed and none of his legal heirs were conversant with the facts of the case and moreover they were depositing the amount towards quantum demand into the Government account.

In view of the above, the ITAT opined that in the interest of justice, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act should be cancelled and accordingly the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the penalty.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted where books of account not maintained – ITAT Allahabad

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…

4 hours ago
  • Empanelment

NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of CA Firms for verification of Stores/Spares & movable assets

NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets.  NALCO has invited Request…

6 hours ago
  • RBI

Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan – RBI revises regulations

Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations  RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…

7 hours ago
  • Excise/Custom

Manufacturing without aid of power. Entire process though by distinct units to be seen – SC

Entire manufacturing process though by distinct units relevant for exemption from excise duty on account of manufacture without aid of…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Delay in filing Form 10B condoned as failure was in 1st year of operation of Trust

High Court condoned delay in filing Form 10B as the failure was in the 1st Year of operation of the…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A quashed for no satisfaction on what was under reporting & misreporting by assessee

Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…

13 hours ago