Income Tax

ITAT directs credit of TDS appearing in old PAN of amalgamating company

ITAT directs credit of TDS appearing in old PAN of amalgamating company to amalgamated company with another PAN

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3711 (2023) (04) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming not granting the credit of tax deducted at source (TDS) available in the erstwhile PAN of the amalgamating company.

The appellant-assessee was a limited company. Vide a Scheme of Amalgamation duly approved by the order of the Hon’ble High Court, another company merged with the assessee-company.

Post amalgamation, the amalgamated company continued the business activity with the changed name but with old PAN.

For the Assessment Year in question, income tax was deducted at source under the PAN of the merged company was claimed against the tax liability of the assessee-company in the return of income. 

However, while processing the return, the Assessing Officer denied the claim of the said TDS due to TDS mismatch since TDS was not appearing in the 26AS under the PAN of the appellant assessee.

The CIT(A) opined that the migration of TDS credit from the old PAN to the PAN of the amalgamated company is to be completed by the AO/department. The AO was directed to pursue the matter of migration with so that the assessee gets full TDS credit. 

Not satisfied with the order of the CIT(A), the assessee approached the ITAT with prayer is to direct the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to provide the tax credit within a time frame so that the necessary action is taken and the issue is not be kept in abeyance.

The Tribunal observed that subsequent to the amalgamation,  the assessee ought to have made necessary arrangements and should have informed the customers of both the  erstwhile  companies  to  deduct  the  tax  under  correct PAN, but still some of the customers of the erstwhile company have deposited TDS under the old PAN.

The Tribunal further noted that the amount of TDS was not in dispute and only not allowing its credit was under challenge.  

Accordingly, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to carry out the necessary verification process at the earliest and after being satisfied about TDS claim of the assessee to grant the credit within four months from the date of receiving this order and also direct  the assessee not to delay the aforesaid proceedings by taking  adjournment  unless  otherwise  required  for  reasonable cause for filing of necessary details. 

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

2 weeks ago