Income Tax

Capital gain deduction u/s 54 for purchase of two flats on different floors allowed by ITAT

Capital gain deduction u/s 54 for purchase of two flats on different floors allowed as flats were one above the other and converted into a single residential duplex unit

The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against he order of the CIT(A) in upholding the action of the Assessing officer making disallowance u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 9the Act) for two residential flats.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2382 (2018) 06 ITAT

The assessee had declared long term capital gains (LTCG) on sale of House Property and had claimed exemption u/s 54 of the Act for purchase of two flats.

The Assessing Officer observed that these two flats purchased by the assessee were located at different floors of the apartment and according to him they did not constitute a single unit entitling the assessee, benefit of exemption u/s 54 in respect of one residential housing.

Assessing Officer further noted that for the one flat, the assessee had not made the full payment.

The AO restricted the exemption u/s 54 in respect of the flat for which full payment had been made and placing reliance on the judgment of decision of Mumbai Tribunal, taxed the balance amount as long term capital gains.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that Section 54 entitles him for a full deduction against the two flat purchased which were adjoining with each other as was evident from the flat numbers.

The Tribunal noted that the Mumbai Tribunal had held that where more than one unit purchased which are adjacent to each other and are converted into one house for the purpose of residence by having common passage, common kitchen etc., it would be a case of investment in one residential house.

It was observed that in the instant case the appellant had purchased two flats at different floors one above the other and made it one single residential duplex unit. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to exemption in respect of investment in both the flats.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Income by deploying ex-servicemen as security guards not business activity

Income of section 25 company by deploying ex-servicemen as security guards was not business activity. In a recent judgment, Kerala…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Draft assessment order cannot give rise to any enforceable demand 

In absence of a valid final assessment order passed within statutory time frame, draft assessment order cannot give rise to…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B if expenditure not claimed in Profit and Loss Account

No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

5 days ago