Income Tax

Deduction us 54B for land purchased in wife’s name disallowed by ITAT following the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court.

Deduction us 54B for land purchased in wife’s name disallowed by ITAT following the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1163 (2017) (03) ITAT

Assessment Year : 2007-08
Date/Month of Pronouncement: February 2017

Brief Facts of the Case:
The appellant assessee sold certain land on which long term capital gain was earned. The assessee purchased, inter alia, an agricultural land in the name of his wife. The Assessing Officer (‘AO’) denied the benefit of deduction under section 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for the purchase of the agricultural land in the name of his wife.

The CIT(A) affirmed the disallowance. The assessee, aggrieved against the denial of deduction u/s 54B came to the Tribunal.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The Tribunal observed that there was no dispute that the new land was purchased by the assessee in the name of his wife. It was observed that there was a cleavage of opinion amongst the Hon’ble High Courts on the question of grant of benefit u/s 54B etc. when the new property is purchased by the transferor in his own name with another or exclusively in the name of another.

It was noted that the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in had held that the benefit of deduction cannot be allowed when a new property is purchased in the name of wife, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court had held that deduction u/s 54F cannot be denied if the property is not purchased in own name.

Held:
Since the assessee fall within the jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, it was held that the assessee was not right in claiming the benefit of section 54B in purchasing new property in the name of his wife.

Download Full Judgment

Similar Judgment: Amritsar ITAT allows deduction u/s 54B for investment in wife’s name Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless evading tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless AO finds that one of them is trying…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

‘Transfer of property’ not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property – ITAT

The word ‘transfer of property’ does not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property and only can be confined…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO was not justified in questioning cash withdrawals from bank account – ITAT

AO is not justified in questioning the cash withdrawals from bank account on the ground that the assessee had sufficient…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Return/Balance sheet filed within limitation extended by SC to be considered within time

Return/Balance sheet to be considered as being within time if filed within timeline condoned by Hon'ble Supreme Court due to…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Satisfaction Note u/s 153C – term immediate cannot be extended to unreasonable delay

Satisfaction Note u/s 153C - term “immediate” cannot be extended to defeats the purpose of cost effective, efficient and expeditious…

2 days ago