Income Tax

Delay in filing appeal due to assessee not present at residence & took time in consulting condoned

Delay in filing appeal due to assessee not present at his residence and took time in consulting his Counsel condoned by ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3326 (2020) (07) ITAT

Important case law relied upon by the parties:
Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)

In the instant case, the appeal of the assessee was directed against the action of the CIT(A) in dismissing his appeal against the assessment order passed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on account of delay in filing the appeal.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee filed affidavit and submitted that the assessment order appealed against was served on the family member of the assessee. However at the time of service of order, the assessee was out of home and travelling for some work. 

It was submitted that when the assessee returned home and thereafter, after few days, when he came to know about the said order, he went to the office of his Counsel. The Counsel told him that the time limit for filing appeal had expired but he had a strong case and reasonable cause for the delay.

Therefore the assessee acting on the advice of the counsel, filed the appeal before the CIT(A) after a dealy of 162 days alongwith prayer for condonation of delay.

The assessee relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein it a liberal approach was advocated while considering a case for condonation of delay.

The Tribunal found that there was a reasonable cause for the  delay in filing the appeal due to non-availability of the assessee at his residence and time taken in consulting his Counsel. 

The Tribunal opined that though there was a delay, the assessee had taken steps in reaching out to his Counsel and has thus not been negligent in safeguarding his rights.

The Tribunal held that no malafide could be imputed against the assessee and condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and the matter was set aside to the file of the CIT(A).

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

17 hours ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

18 hours ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

2 days ago
  • contract-law

UP Govt. notifies reduced rate of registration/stamp duty fees on lease agreements

Uttar Pradesh Government has notified reduced / concessional rate of registration and stamp duty fees on lease / rent agreements.…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

First-time experience in filing appeal a reasonable & bona fide cause for delay

First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…

4 days ago