Income Tax

Deposit of TDS under wrong TAN – ITAT directed credit of TDS after verification of challan

Deposit of TDS under wrong TAN – ITAT directs credit of TDS to the assessee after verification of challan

In the instant appeal, the appellant assessee had challenged the order of the CIT(A) in the matter of order passed under Sections 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2338 (2018) (05) ITAT

The appellant, by inadvertent mistake, had deposited the tax deducted at source (TDS) by mentioning in the challan the wrong Tax Deduction Account Number (TAN).The assessee had filed TDS Return in Form no. 24Q for the relevant quarter, however due to the wrong TAN, appellant had not received credit for the TDS so deposited.

The AO observed that the assessee had committed defaults by non-payment of TDS amount deducted. Accordingly he raised demand under Section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act.

Before the CIT(A), with respect to the mistake, the assessee filed certificate of Bank stating that the amounts corresponding to the challan had been debited to the assessee’s account. The assessee prayed CIT(A) to ask the AO to give credit for the said challan in view of an apparent mistake in the mentioning of the TAN.

However, the CIT(A) rejected the appeal.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee pointed out an order of the Coordinate Bench wherein under similar facts, the AO was directed to give credit for the tax deducted at source . In the said case, the assessee had inadvertently deposited TDS under wrong TAN and also in one challan wrong section had been mentioned.  and wrong section the AO had raised the demand. The assessee requested the CIT(A) that the AO be directed to make required corrections and provide credit in the correct TAN and drop the demand against the assessee. The CIT(A) after considering the evidences furnished, directed the AO to allow necessary relief after proper verification of the original challan furnished by the assessee. The Revenue challenged the order of the CIT(A) before the Tribunal but did not raise any contention in respect of TDS deposited under the wrong TAN.

Even with respect to the contention of the Revenue that assessee should have filed a correction statement to rectify the wrong section and in absence of that the credit had not been given to the assessee, the Tribunal opined that once the challan is deposited with the bank, it would not be possible for assessee to retrieve the same and make any correction.

Accordingly following the decision of the Coordinate Bench, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the original challan for deposit of TDS and decide the issue as per the direction given by the Coordinate Bench.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Also Read:

PrCIT directed to resolve the issue of TDS deposited  in wrong TAN Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago