Income Tax

Disallowance challenged in appeal against original assessment u/s 143(3) can not be made again in search assessment

Disallowance challenged and pending in appeal against original assessment u/s 143(3) can not be made again in search assessment framed u/s 153A/153C of the Income Tax Act

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2362 (2018) 06 ITAT

The instant appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [(CIT (A)], inter alia, challenging sustaining of the disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessment was originally completed u/s 143(3) of the Act in which addition was made u/s 40A(3) of the Act. This order was challenged before the CIT(A) and the matter was sub-judice before the Tribunal.

Consequent to a search carried out at various premises of a company and its group concerns and associated persons (Group cases) the assessment was framed in the hands of the assessee u/s 153A/153C of the Act. While completing the assessment the AO again made the addition for the same issue u/s 40A(3) of the Act which was sustained by the CIT(A).

Before the Tribunal, it was contended that since addition was already sub-judice before the Tribunal in regular appeal arising from the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act the same disallowance cannot be made in subsequent assessment framed u/s 153A/153C of the Act, as it amounted to a double addition.

The Tribunal opined that once the disallowance made u/s 40A(3) of the Act was a subject matter of appeal in an appeal arising from the original assessment order framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, the same addition in subsequent search assessment proceedings framed u/s 153A/153C of the Act was not sustainable in the eyes of law as it amounted to a double addition.

The Tribunal, accordingly set aside the order passed by the CIT(A) and deleted the addition.  

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Addition u/s 68 deleted as AO failed to find any discrepancy in details submitted

Addition u/s 68 deleted as AO failed to find any discrepancy in details of creditors submitted by the assessee In…

2 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank-Empanelment of retired officers as Concurrent auditors

Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank - Empanelment of retired officers of banks as Concurrent auditors on contract basis Jharkhand Rajya Gramin…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Book Profit u/s 115JB can not be computed as per cash basis of accounting

Book Profit u/s 115JB to be computed as per Profit & Loss Account prepared under Schedule III of the Companies…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order not in conformity of Faceless Assessment Scheme if not est? – ITAT remands case

Order not in conformity of Faceless Assessment Scheme 2019 if not est? - ITAT remands the case in view of…

2 days ago
  • FCRA

Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.09.2024

Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.09.2024 Home Ministry has decided to extend the validity of FCRA…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 68 to 69B applicable only if assessee is required to maintain books of accounts

Provisions of section 68 to 69B applicable only if assessee is required to maintain books of accounts under provisions of…

3 days ago