Income Tax

Disproportionate increase in expenses in relation to turnover not a reason for disallowance – ITAT

Disproportionate increase in expenses in relation to turnover can not be reason in itself for making adhoc disallowance without cogent material – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2076 (2017) (09) ITAT

Assessment Year :  2012-13

Brief Facts of the Case:
The Petitioner assessee had claimed certain expenses. On being called upon to explain the reason for increase in expenses as compared from the previous year’s figure the assessee submitted that there was increase in the turnover as well.

The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the assessee’s contention on the ground that the turnover increased only by 110% as against the increase in the particular expenses to the tune of 300%. Considering these facts, he made a disallowance at 20% of the said expenses, which resulted into an addition.

 No relief was allowed in the first appeal. Aggrieved against sustenance of disallowance, the assessee was before the Tribunal.

Observations made by the Tribunal:
The ITAT observed that as contended by the assessee, the actual incurring of Sampling expenses to the extent claimed in the Profit & Loss Account had not been controverted by the authorities with any cogent material.

The ITAT opined that simply because such expenses had increased disproportionately in relation to the increase in the turnover, could not be a reason in itself for making disallowance of part of the expenses on ad hoc basis.

The ITAT observed that no worthwhile reason had been assigned by the authorities for making and sustaining disallowance @ 20% on particular expenses incurred by the assessee.

Held:
The order was set aside with direction to allow deduction of expenses as claimed by the assessee.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

2 weeks ago