Income Tax

Education Cess cannot be allowed as an expenditure in view of later amendment – SC

Education Cess cannot be allowed as an expenditure in view of the subsequent amendments in the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Supreme Court

In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had allowed the appeal of the Revenue observing that in view of the subsequent amendments in the Income Tax Act, 1961, “Education Cess” cannot be allowed as an expenditure.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3973 (2024) (04) SC

However, in 2020 the Bombay High Court had held that education cess is allowable expenditure as word “cess” is absent under the provisions of section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act)

The Hon’ble Supreme Court had admitted the Special Leave Petition of the Department against the said judgment of the Bombay High Court.

The question raised before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court was as to whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess is allowable as a deduction in the year of payment?

The Hon’ble High Court had observed that in section 40(a)(ii) there was no reference to any “cess”. Therefore, there was no scope to consider “cess” being in the nature of a “Tax” as contended by the Revenue. Further, the Hon’ble High Court had opined that if the legislature intended to prohibit the deduction of amounts paid by a Assessee towards “education cess” or any other “cess”, then, the legislature could have easily included reference to “cess” in clause (ii) of Section 40(a) of the IT Act. The fact that the legislature had not done so means that the legislature did not intend to prevent the deduction of amounts paid by a Assessee towards the “cess”, when it comes to computing income chargeable under the head “profits and gains of business or profession.

Several ITAT have allowed the deduction of “education cess” as expenditure following the judgment of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court and also in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the cess is not tax.

However, the Finance Act 2022 has amended the section 40(a)(ii) by inserting Explanation 3 to the clause (ii) as above providing that tax shall also include any cess and hence shall be not deductible u/s 40 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

It is notable that the Finance Act 2022 had made the said amendment w.e.f. 01.04.2005 to nullify the impact of the judgements passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court and Rajasthan High Court.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

Agreement validly terminated prior to CIRP not give any enforceable right to corporate debtor

Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…

17 hours ago
  • negotiable instrument act

SC explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques

Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Normal business advances adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act

Advances received in normal course of business and adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of the Income…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Faceless mechanism for reopening include Central & International Tax charges

Faceless mechanism for income escaping assessment would not exclude the Central charges and International Taxation charges from its application -…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Ground not adjudicated by 1st appellate authority cannot be decided in 2nd appeal

Ground not adjudicated by first appellate authority or ground not originating from first appellate order cannot be decided in second…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

COVID-19 amounted to a force majeure event – HC directs condonation of delay in filing ITR

High Court directed ITD to consider condonation of delay in filing ITR for four years as the COVID-19 pandemic constituted…

2 days ago