Income Tax

Ex parte order passed without considering e-mail sent to AO restored by ITAT

Ex parte order passed without considering e-mail sent to Assessing Officer and CIT(A) restored back to AO by ITAT 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2601 (2018) (10) ITAT

The instant appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A).

The assessee was an individual and filed her return of income declaring total income of Rs. 5,60,390/-. Despite issue of notice u/s 143 (2) and 142 (1) there was no compliance from the assessee. The Assessing Officer, therefore, completed the assessment u/s 144 of the Act and determined the total income at Rs. 10,71,560/- by adding an amount of Rs. 5,17,166/- estimating the profit at 2% of the turnover.

In appeal the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal by upholding the addition made by the Assessing Officer on the ground that assessee did not make any compliance to the various notices issued by the Assessing Officer.

The assessee submitted that the assessee had sent e-mail to the Assessing Officer on two occasion giving all the details as called for by him. However, these details were neither considered by the Assessing Officer nor by the CIT(A).

Further it was submitted that the case was not effectively represented by the counsel for the assessee. It was submitted that in the interest of justice the matter should be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer since the assessment was completed ex-parte.

The Tribunal noted that admitted fact was that the assessment was completed exparte by the Assessing Officer due to non appearance by the assessee before him despite service of notice. However, as per the submission of the assessee, the e-mail sent by the assessee were not considered by the Assessing Officer or CIT (A).

Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to decide the issue afresh.  It was directed that the Assessing Officer shall give due opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue as per law. The assessee was also directed to appear before the Assessing Officer and substantiate her case failing which the Assessing Officer shall pass appropriate order as per law.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago