Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54EC allowed as delay in investment was due to father in ICU 

Exemption u/s 54EC allowed as delay in investment in REC Bonds was due to father of the assessee in ICU 

In a recent judgment, ITAT as allowed the benefits of investment made in REC Bonds u/s 54EC where delay was caused due to father of assessee was in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3866 (2024) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) of NFAC in disallowing the capital gain exemption u/s 54EC on the ground of delay of 19 days in investment of sale proceeds in REC Bonds.

The assessee has sold a property and to save capital gain tax, purchased residential house and also invested in REC Bonds which was 19 days after the prescribed date.

The Assessing Officer (AO), NFAC disallowed the claim of exemption u/s 54EC for the delay of 19 days in making the investment in REC Bonds and made an addition to income.

On first appeal, the CIT (A) confirmed the addition made on the ground that there is no provision in the income tax act which empowers the AO or the CIT(A) to condone the delay of investment in specified assets for availing the benefits of deduction u/s 54EC of the Act.

Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee was before the ITAT.

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had disallowed deduction from LTCG holding that the investment in REC Bonds was delayed by 19 days post prescribed period.

The assessee submitted that, during the relevant Assessment Year, the father of the assessee was in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for a month and ultimately died in January which

laid to the trauma in the family and assessee had to move from city to city.

The Tribunal opined that the reasons given by the assessee are acceptable and it does not defeat the legislative intention.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the assessee be given the benefits of investment made in REC Bonds u/s. 54 EC of the Income Tax Act 1961

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A quashed for no satisfaction on what was under reporting & misreporting by assessee

Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…

2 hours ago
  • GST

Govt has notified the Manipur Goods & Services Tax (2nd Amendment) Act 2025

Govt has notified the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2025 The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha…

3 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Small Company threshold of paid up capital and turnover increased w.e.f 1st December 2025

Small Company threshold of paid-up capital increased to Rs. ten crores and turnover to Rs. hundred crores w.e.f. 1st December…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

For registration u/s 12AA if CIT satisfaction limited to objects or also to activities? SLP admitted

For registration u/s 12AA if Commissioner’s satisfaction is limited to the objects of the Institution, or also to genuineness of…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Over 30 approvals u/s 153D within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind

Over 30 approvals u/s 153D granted within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind – Bombay High Court In a…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

When disallowance is made u/s 37(1) section 69C is not applicable – ITAT

When AO invoked provisions of section 37(1) to disallow purchases, provisions of section 69C of the Act are not applicable…

2 days ago