High Court declines to entertain Writ Petition against income tax penalty order in view of alternative remedy available by way of appellate provisions
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2406 (2018) 07 HC
The petitioner assessee had not submitted his return of income an audit reports for the relevant assessment year within the prescribed due date and were filed belatedly.
A show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner and eventually the Assessing officer imposed penalties under section 271F and section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Later, demand notices under Section 156 of the Act were issued.
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court challenging the penalty and the demand notices.
The petitioner tried to convince Hon’ble High Court that it was an eminent matter to be entertained, despite the alternative remedy the petitioner had.
On the other hand, the Revenue contended that the penalty order itself contains a reference to the appellate provision.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that under Section 246 of the Act, the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy.
His Lordship declined to entertain the writ petition.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…
PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…
Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…
When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…
Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…
CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…