High Court declines to entertain Writ Petition against income tax penalty order in view of alternative remedy available by way of appellate provisions
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2406 (2018) 07 HC
The petitioner assessee had not submitted his return of income an audit reports for the relevant assessment year within the prescribed due date and were filed belatedly.
A show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner and eventually the Assessing officer imposed penalties under section 271F and section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Later, demand notices under Section 156 of the Act were issued.
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court challenging the penalty and the demand notices.
The petitioner tried to convince Hon’ble High Court that it was an eminent matter to be entertained, despite the alternative remedy the petitioner had.
On the other hand, the Revenue contended that the penalty order itself contains a reference to the appellate provision.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that under Section 246 of the Act, the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy.
His Lordship declined to entertain the writ petition.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…