High Court quashed the appointment of Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) when the matter was remanded on a specific issue and no complexity was involved in the adjudication
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2576 (2018) (10) HC
For the relevant assessment year, the petitioner’s return of income was processed and assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Thereafter, the Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to reopen the assessment, for which, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued and finally, revised assessment order was passed.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), which was allowed.
The said appellate order was challenged by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Tribunal remanded the matter, only for the purpose of adjudicating the issue regarding the deposit of a specific sum.
As per the order of the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the issue of deposit with relevant materials and thereafter, to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
However, the Assessing Officer, passed the impugned order by which he appointed a chartered accountant as Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) of the Act.
Hence, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition praying quashing of the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and directing the AO to complete the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 of the Act based on the directions of the Tribunal.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal had modify the order of the CIT(A) and set aside the issue of deposit to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification with relevant materials and direction to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
No where, the Assessing Officer was directed to entrust the work with Special Auditor. Moreover, in the impugned order also, there was no whisper as to the complexity involved in the adjudication of the case.
The Government Counsel appearing for the Assessing Officer (AO) fairly submitted that the impugned order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration.
The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and the matter was remitted back to the file of the AO for fresh consideration.
Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…
Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment - ITAT In…
Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…
CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…
Power of CIT(A) under section 251(1)(a) to remand case could be exercised only when the assessment is passed u/s 144…
ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines, 2025 kept in abeyance In February 2026, ICAI had issued ICAI (Global Networking) Guidelines 2025 to…