High Court quashed the appointment of Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) when the matter was remanded on a specific issue and no complexity was involved in the adjudication
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2576 (2018) (10) HC
For the relevant assessment year, the petitioner’s return of income was processed and assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Thereafter, the Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to reopen the assessment, for which, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued and finally, revised assessment order was passed.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), which was allowed.
The said appellate order was challenged by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Tribunal remanded the matter, only for the purpose of adjudicating the issue regarding the deposit of a specific sum.
As per the order of the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the issue of deposit with relevant materials and thereafter, to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
However, the Assessing Officer, passed the impugned order by which he appointed a chartered accountant as Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) of the Act.
Hence, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition praying quashing of the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and directing the AO to complete the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 of the Act based on the directions of the Tribunal.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal had modify the order of the CIT(A) and set aside the issue of deposit to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification with relevant materials and direction to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
No where, the Assessing Officer was directed to entrust the work with Special Auditor. Moreover, in the impugned order also, there was no whisper as to the complexity involved in the adjudication of the case.
The Government Counsel appearing for the Assessing Officer (AO) fairly submitted that the impugned order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration.
The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and the matter was remitted back to the file of the AO for fresh consideration.
AO is under an obligation to duly consider the explanation furnished by the assessee and assign reasons for rejecting the…
CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices under Postal Import Regulations, 2025. Standard Operating Procedure…
Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, cannot be rendered void or inoperative merely for non…
No fault in serving notice u/s 148 to last known address when assessee had not updated change of address in…
Investment made by firm through capital introduced by partners cannot be treated as unexplained investment in the hands of the…
Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 is hosted - Last date for submission is 29.08.2026 ICAI has hosted the Multipurpose Empanelment…