Income Tax

High Court quashed appointment of Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) in Writ Petition

High Court quashed the appointment of Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) when the matter was remanded on a specific issue and no complexity was involved in the adjudication

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2576 (2018) (10) HC

For the relevant assessment year, the petitioner’s return of income was processed and assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Thereafter, the Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to reopen the assessment, for which, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued and finally, revised assessment order was passed.

Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), which was allowed.

The said appellate order was challenged by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Tribunal remanded the matter, only for the purpose of adjudicating the issue regarding the deposit of a specific sum.

As per the order of the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the issue of deposit with relevant materials and thereafter, to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.

However, the Assessing Officer, passed the impugned order by which he appointed a chartered accountant as Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) of the Act.

Hence, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition praying quashing of the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and directing the AO to complete the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 of the Act based on the directions of the Tribunal.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal had modify the order of the CIT(A) and set aside the issue of deposit to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification with relevant materials and direction to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.

No where, the Assessing Officer was directed to entrust the work with Special Auditor. Moreover, in the impugned order also, there was no whisper as to the complexity involved in the adjudication of the case.

The Government Counsel appearing for the Assessing Officer (AO) fairly submitted that the impugned order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration.

The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and the matter was remitted back to the file of the AO for fresh consideration.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

When assessee did not opt yes or no to receive notices by email, such notices were no service

When assessee did not opt yes or no to receive notices by email, such notices amounted to no service In…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CIT(A) should have considered detailed statement of facts before dismissing appeal

CIT(A) should have considered the details statement of facts filed before him before dismissing the appeal of the assessee observing…

2 hours ago
  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations June 2026. Last date 28.04.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations June 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

1 day ago
  • CA CS CMA

Engagement of Young Professionals CA for assistance in ITAT representation

Income Tax Department Pune is engaging Young Professionals CA for assistance in ITAT representation With a view to augment departmental…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

IDBI online application for empanelment of Concurrent Auditor. Last date : 27.04.2026

IDBI invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountant firms as Concurrent Auditor for FY 2026-27 IDBI Bank has invited online…

2 days ago
  • Bank

Audit reports must be disclosed by bank before classifying account of a customer as fraud

Audit reports must be disclosed if considered relevant by banks in classifying the account of a customer as fraud –…

2 days ago