High Court quashed the appointment of Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) when the matter was remanded on a specific issue and no complexity was involved in the adjudication
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2576 (2018) (10) HC
For the relevant assessment year, the petitioner’s return of income was processed and assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Thereafter, the Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to reopen the assessment, for which, notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued and finally, revised assessment order was passed.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), which was allowed.
The said appellate order was challenged by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Tribunal remanded the matter, only for the purpose of adjudicating the issue regarding the deposit of a specific sum.
As per the order of the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the issue of deposit with relevant materials and thereafter, to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
However, the Assessing Officer, passed the impugned order by which he appointed a chartered accountant as Special Auditor u/s 142(2A) of the Act.
Hence, the assessee had filed a Writ Petition praying quashing of the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and directing the AO to complete the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 of the Act based on the directions of the Tribunal.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal had modify the order of the CIT(A) and set aside the issue of deposit to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification with relevant materials and direction to adjudicate the issue afresh as per law.
No where, the Assessing Officer was directed to entrust the work with Special Auditor. Moreover, in the impugned order also, there was no whisper as to the complexity involved in the adjudication of the case.
The Government Counsel appearing for the Assessing Officer (AO) fairly submitted that the impugned order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration.
The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned order appointing Special Auditor and the matter was remitted back to the file of the AO for fresh consideration.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…