Income Tax

Income Tax Systems show pending refunds of Rs. 29000 crores approx

Income Tax Systems show pending refunds of Rs. 29000 crores approx

In a recent  communication issued by the Director of Income Tax (Systems), New Delhi, a sum of Rs. 28941.50 crores (for cases  with refund greater than Rs. one crores) is showing as pending in the system. The data of pending refund pertains to both scrutiny cases and non-scrutiny processing cases with respect to various Assessment Years (i.e. 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17). Out of the said amount, Rs. 27361.48 crores belongs to scrutiny cases, while Rs. 1580.02 crores relates to Non scrutiny cases.

Presently, Assessing Officers are required to complete scrutiny proceeding in lTD system or on Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) as well as process e-filed returns transferred by CPC in certain scenarios for various AYs.

The DGIT(Systems) has requested that all Assessing Officers may be immediately directed to verify the accuracy of the pendency for processing as well as scrutiny completion since it is possible that the same may have been done manually and the order not uploaded on the system.

Read the Communication from DGIT(Systems)  Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B if expenditure not claimed in Profit and Loss Account

No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…

28 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

4 days ago