Income Tax

ITD examining ITR of salaried assessee claiming refunds – Precautions for Tax Consultants

ITD examining ITR of salaried assessee claiming refunds – Precautions for Tax Consultants/ Tax Practitioners 

Income Tax Department is scanning allowances and deductions claimed by Salaried Taxpayers claiming refunds

Recently, the Income Tax Department caught an Income Tax refund scam in Andhra Pradesh and Telengana. The scam amounts to Rs. 40 crores.

The modus operandi in all such cases was that Tax Consultants and the assessee collide to claim heavy refund of the tax deducted at source from salary and the consultant gets a hefty percentage of the refund obtained.  The return is filed claiming fraudulent exempt allowances (including Housing Loan interest, House Rent Allowance etc.) and various deductions under Chapter VIA (i.e. section 80C – insurance premium etc., , 80D – Medical insurance, 80G – donations, 80CCD – Pension funds etc.).

Under e-filing of return there is no requirement to attach proof of the deductions/allowances so claimed. Also processing of ITR at CPC Bengaluru  is not designed to examine deductions/allowances so claimed. The examination takes place only when the return are selected for scrutiny which is barely 1 percent of the returns filed.

In view of the above scam, the Income Tax Department has decided to examine allowances / deductions claimed particularly by salaried persons by way of calling information/ documentary proof of such claims. The Department is also seeking information of the tax consultants who have filed the return of the assessee.

The information is called under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which authorises Income Tax Officers to call information from any person. The failure to comply with notice can  cause a penalty of Rs 500 per day under section 272A.

Though the Tax consultant is not required to examine/verify the various claim of the client, some precautions should be taken before filing a return of income of the client.

The Tax consultant must get the computation of income and taxation signed by the client specifically stating that :

(i) That the computation of income and taxation of the client has been made on the basis of information given and the Tax Consultant has only filed the return on the basis of computation made and not verified the claims of allowances/deductions.

(ii) That the client shall be solely responsible for any mis-statement made or wrong information given for the computation of income made.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books

No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…

15 hours ago
  • arbitration

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…

16 hours ago
  • divorce

Loan repayments for assets acquisition not deductible for determining maintenance to wife

Repayments of loans taken for asset generation can’t be deducted  to arrive at earning capacity for determining maintenance to wife…

2 days ago
  • arbitration

Supreme Court explains distinction between seat and venue of arbitration

Seat of arbitration is governed by the agreement of the parties and not by the place of hearing or the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance quashed as CIT (A) has power of enhancements – ITAT

ITAT quashed order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance observing in appellate proceedings, CIT(A) has power of enhancements of income assessed, if…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

3 days ago