ITD examining ITR of salaried assessee claiming refunds – Precautions for Tax Consultants/ Tax Practitioners
Income Tax Department is scanning allowances and deductions claimed by Salaried Taxpayers claiming refunds
Recently, the Income Tax Department caught an Income Tax refund scam in Andhra Pradesh and Telengana. The scam amounts to Rs. 40 crores.
The modus operandi in all such cases was that Tax Consultants and the assessee collide to claim heavy refund of the tax deducted at source from salary and the consultant gets a hefty percentage of the refund obtained. The return is filed claiming fraudulent exempt allowances (including Housing Loan interest, House Rent Allowance etc.) and various deductions under Chapter VIA (i.e. section 80C – insurance premium etc., , 80D – Medical insurance, 80G – donations, 80CCD – Pension funds etc.).
Under e-filing of return there is no requirement to attach proof of the deductions/allowances so claimed. Also processing of ITR at CPC Bengaluru is not designed to examine deductions/allowances so claimed. The examination takes place only when the return are selected for scrutiny which is barely 1 percent of the returns filed.
In view of the above scam, the Income Tax Department has decided to examine allowances / deductions claimed particularly by salaried persons by way of calling information/ documentary proof of such claims. The Department is also seeking information of the tax consultants who have filed the return of the assessee.
The information is called under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which authorises Income Tax Officers to call information from any person. The failure to comply with notice can cause a penalty of Rs 500 per day under section 272A.
Though the Tax consultant is not required to examine/verify the various claim of the client, some precautions should be taken before filing a return of income of the client.
The Tax consultant must get the computation of income and taxation signed by the client specifically stating that :
(i) That the computation of income and taxation of the client has been made on the basis of information given and the Tax Consultant has only filed the return on the basis of computation made and not verified the claims of allowances/deductions.
(ii) That the client shall be solely responsible for any mis-statement made or wrong information given for the computation of income made.
- Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus
- Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC
- Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV
- AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee
- ICAI Intermediate & Foundation Examinations to be held thrice in a year from May/June 2024
