Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction of an authority to pass the order is questioned then the foundational fact questioned is to be first decided-ITAT
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1118 (2017) (02) ITAT
Assessment Year : 2009-10
Date/Month of Judgment/Order: February, 2017
Brief Facts of the Case:
The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded the assessment at an income which was approx Rs. four lacs higher than the returned income by the order u/s 143/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).
Before the CIT(Appeals) the assessee raised the jurisdictional issue. However it was dismissed as being general and consequential in nature requiring no adjudication.
Observations made by the ITAT:
The Tribunal observed that the jurisdictional issue could not be said to be a general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction of an authority to pass the order is questioned then the foundational fact questioned is to be first decided as per law on facts applicable to it.
Held:
The order passed without deciding the jurisdictional issue was set aside and the issue was restored back to the CIT(A) with a direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…