Income Tax

Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction is questioned it is to be first decided.

Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction of an authority to pass the order is questioned then the foundational fact questioned is to be first decided-ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 1118 (2017) (02) ITAT

Assessment Year : 2009-10
Date/Month of Judgment/Order: February, 2017

Brief Facts of the Case:
The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded the assessment at an income which was approx Rs. four lacs higher than the returned income by the order u/s 143/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).

Before the CIT(Appeals) the assessee raised the jurisdictional issue. However it was dismissed as being general and consequential in nature requiring no adjudication.

Observations made by the ITAT:
The Tribunal observed that the jurisdictional issue could not be said to be a general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction of an authority to pass the order is questioned then the foundational fact questioned is to be first decided as per law on facts applicable to it.

Held:
The order passed without deciding the jurisdictional issue was set aside and the issue was restored back to the CIT(A) with a direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago