Income Tax

Mere payment of remuneration to trustees not attract section 13(1)(d) unless excessive or unreasonable

Mere payment of remuneration to trustees not attract section 13(1)(d) of Income Tax Act unless it is excessive or unreasonable as compared to services rendered

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2558 (2018) (10) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
CIT vs. Kamla Town Trust, 279 ITR 089 (All)

The appellant assessee was a a charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The trust had filed an appeal alleging that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer in not allowing exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act on the ground that the assessee violated inter alia the provisions of section 13(1)(d) of the Act on account of payment of remuneration to the Secretary and President of the assessee society.

The Tribunal opined that a bare perusal of provisions of section 13(1)(d) of the Act show that to attract these provisions, it is not enough that remuneration has been paid to trustees but it has to be also shown that the remuneration paid is excessive or unreasonable as compared to the services rendered by those persons.

It was observed that nowhere the Assessing Officer had even alleged that the remuneration paid to trustees were excessive or unreasonable. The AO proceeded on the assumption that section 13(1)(d) of the Act is attracted merely on making of payment of remuneration to the trustees whereas the legal position is not such.

The Tribunal found that there was no material brought by the revenue to show that the remuneration paid to the four persons in question were excessive or unreasonable having regard to the services rendered by them.

In view of the above, the Tribunal opined that the allegation of the Assessing Officer that there was violation of provisions of section 13(1)(d) was unsustainable.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of lower authorities with direction to the Assessing Officer to allow exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act to the assessee as per law.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

35 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

1 week ago