Income Tax

No addition for inflated statement of stock submitted to banker – High Court

No addition for inflated statement of stock submitted to banker when no discrepancy was found in physical verification and books of account-High Court uphelds ITAT Decision

 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2134 (2017) (11) HC

The appellant assessee was a sole proprietor involved in the business of sale and purchase of foodgrains on commission basis. The Assessing Officer (AO) made a substantial addition for difference and discrepancy in the stock as per books and statock statement submitted to banker. The AO was of the opinion that the addition was justified on account of the discrepancy.

The Commissioner Appeals was satisfied with the assessee’s explanation with respect to inflated statement of stock with the bankers and noted that no discrepancy in the stock statements as appearing from the physical verification and that apparent from the books of account emerged. The amount was, therefore, deleted.

The ITAT upheld the findings of the CIT(A).

The Revenue challenged the order of the ITAT before the High Court.

The High Court opined that in view of the concurrent findings of fact, no substantial question of law arose as the issue pertained to pure appreciation of facts.

The appeal was dismissed 

Download Full Judgment

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago