Income Tax

Partners capital not loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS – ITAT confirms deletion of penalty u/s 271D

Partners capital not loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS – ITAT confirms deletion of penalty u/s 271D for capital contributed by partner in cash.

The Revenue had filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) whereby he deleted the penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for alleged violation of section 269SS.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2349 ( 2018) 05 ITAT

The respondent assessee was a partnership firm. During the relevant year, the firm had received capital contribution in cash from its partner on various dates.

The Assessing Officer (AO) made an observation that the receipt of capital contribution from the partner by the assessee firm amounted to loan or deposit and since the same was received in cash, it had violated the provisions of section 269SS of the Act. Accordingly, he imposed a penalty u/s 271D of the Act being 100% of the capital contributed in cash.

The CIT(A) observed that introduction of capital contributed by a partner in the partnership firm does not fall under the ambit of loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS of the Act. Moreover, he observed that the partner had duly reflected this introduction of capital in the partnership firm in his individual balance sheet. The CIT(A) also observed that the assessee firm also had treated the receipt from the partner as capital introduced by the said partner. Accordingly he deleted the penalty levied u/s 271D of the Act.

The Tribunal observed that the capital contributed by the partner in the partnership firm does not tantamount to loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS of the Act.

Accordingly it opined that there was no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) cancelling the penalty. Therefore the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

22 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

4 days ago
  • SEBI

Order to stock broker by WhatsApp are legally verifiable record – SEBI

Order to stock broker through WhatsApp may be considered as legally verifiable record - SEBI SEBI in an informal guidance…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI Guidance Note on Audit of Banks, 2025 Edition

ICAI Guidance Note on Audit of Banks 2026 Edition ICAI has issued 2025 edition of the Guidance Note on Audit…

4 days ago