Partners capital not loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS – ITAT confirms deletion of penalty u/s 271D for capital contributed by partner in cash.
The Revenue had filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) whereby he deleted the penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for alleged violation of section 269SS.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2349 ( 2018) 05 ITAT
The respondent assessee was a partnership firm. During the relevant year, the firm had received capital contribution in cash from its partner on various dates.
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an observation that the receipt of capital contribution from the partner by the assessee firm amounted to loan or deposit and since the same was received in cash, it had violated the provisions of section 269SS of the Act. Accordingly, he imposed a penalty u/s 271D of the Act being 100% of the capital contributed in cash.
The CIT(A) observed that introduction of capital contributed by a partner in the partnership firm does not fall under the ambit of loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS of the Act. Moreover, he observed that the partner had duly reflected this introduction of capital in the partnership firm in his individual balance sheet. The CIT(A) also observed that the assessee firm also had treated the receipt from the partner as capital introduced by the said partner. Accordingly he deleted the penalty levied u/s 271D of the Act.
The Tribunal observed that the capital contributed by the partner in the partnership firm does not tantamount to loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS of the Act.
Accordingly it opined that there was no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) cancelling the penalty. Therefore the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…
No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…
A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…
Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…
Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…
Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…