Income Tax

Printing-publishing eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) in view of Kerala and Delhi High Court Judgments-CBDT Circular 15/2016

Printing-publishing eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) in view of Kerala and Delhi High Court Judgments

Circular No. 15/2016

F No. 279/Misc/140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, 18th May, 2016

Subject:  Additional Depreciation u /s 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 -reg.

An assessee, engaged in the business of manufacture or production of an article or thing, is eligible to claim additional depreciation under clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in addition to the depreciation allowance under sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Act.

2. Whether or not an assessee engaged in printing or printing and publishing is eligible for grant of additional depreciation under clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Act, has been a contentious issue. In other words, whether printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of article or thing has been contested in legal forums.

3. The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Mathrubhoomi Printing & Publishing Co. vide its judgment 1 dated 2.2015 in ITA No 23 of 2015 relied upon the Hon’ble Delhi High Court judgement dated 31.5.2013 in ITA No 49 of 1996 in the case of Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. and held that printing and publishing activity is a manufacturing activity and therefore, assessee is eligible for grant of additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia).

3. The Board has accepted the position that printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of article or The judgments of Hon’ble Delhi and Kerala High Courts on this issue have been accepted. Thus the issue relating to grant of deprecation u/s 32(1) (iia) has not been further contested, though the Delhi High Court judgment has been contested on other issues.

4. It is, therefore , a settled position that the business of printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of an article or thing and is accordingly eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) of the Act. Henceforth , appeals may not be filed on this ground by officers of the Department and those already filed, in Courts/Tribunals may be withdrawn I not pressed upon.

6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCI   (OSD)(ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

14 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

23 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

24 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago