Income Tax

Printing-publishing eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) in view of Kerala and Delhi High Court Judgments-CBDT Circular 15/2016

Printing-publishing eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) in view of Kerala and Delhi High Court Judgments

Circular No. 15/2016

F No. 279/Misc/140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, 18th May, 2016

Subject:  Additional Depreciation u /s 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 -reg.

An assessee, engaged in the business of manufacture or production of an article or thing, is eligible to claim additional depreciation under clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in addition to the depreciation allowance under sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Act.

2. Whether or not an assessee engaged in printing or printing and publishing is eligible for grant of additional depreciation under clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Act, has been a contentious issue. In other words, whether printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of article or thing has been contested in legal forums.

3. The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Mathrubhoomi Printing & Publishing Co. vide its judgment 1 dated 2.2015 in ITA No 23 of 2015 relied upon the Hon’ble Delhi High Court judgement dated 31.5.2013 in ITA No 49 of 1996 in the case of Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. and held that printing and publishing activity is a manufacturing activity and therefore, assessee is eligible for grant of additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia).

3. The Board has accepted the position that printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of article or The judgments of Hon’ble Delhi and Kerala High Courts on this issue have been accepted. Thus the issue relating to grant of deprecation u/s 32(1) (iia) has not been further contested, though the Delhi High Court judgment has been contested on other issues.

4. It is, therefore , a settled position that the business of printing or printing and publishing amounts to manufacture or production of an article or thing and is accordingly eligible for additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) of the Act. Henceforth , appeals may not be filed on this ground by officers of the Department and those already filed, in Courts/Tribunals may be withdrawn I not pressed upon.

6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCI   (OSD)(ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

22 minutes ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

5 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

7 days ago