Income Tax

Provision reducing asset side of balance sheet amounts to writing off bad debts in accordance with section 36 (2)

If asset side of balance sheet is reduced by provision made, it amounts to writing of the debts in accordance with the provision of section 36 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2554 (2018) (10) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Vijaya Bank 323 ITR 166

The appellant company was engaged in the business of civil construction. During the course of the scrutiny assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer noticed that the asssessee has claimed deduction u/s 36(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The Assessing Officer disallowed the same because he was of the opinion that mere making a provision in the books of account for bad debts was not allowable rather the debt must be written off.

When the matter was agitated before the first appellate authority the CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer stating that the claim of bad debts was not in accordance with the provision of section 36 (2) of the IT Act and therefore could not be allowed.

Aggrieved, the assessee appealed to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal opined that both the lower authorities have grossly erred in not appreciating the facts in true perspective. Both the lower authorities ignored the fact that the asset side is actually reduced by the amount of bad debts which means that the debt has been actually written of.

The Tribunal relied ipin the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court where it was categorically held that if the asset side is reduced by the provision it amounts to writing of the debts.

The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance on account of provision for bad debts.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

If assessee fails to explain source of purchases, estimating profit rate contrary to Section 69C

When assessee failed to explain source of purchases expenditure, estimating profit rate was contrary to provision of Section 69C which…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD for delay

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD on adopting a long process resulting delay…

14 hours ago
  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

2 days ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

2 days ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

3 days ago